2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-005-0352-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability in an age-structured metapopulation model

Abstract: We present a discrete model for a metapopulation of a single species with overlapping generations. Based on the dynamical behavior of the system in absence of dispersal, we have shown that a migration mechanism which depends only on age can not stabilize a previously unstable homogeneous equilibrium, but can drive a stable uncoupled system to instability if the migration rules are strongly related to age structure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we describe local dynamics as scalars, while local populations might have a more detailed structure, especially in age. The interaction between age structure and spatial structure has been shown to influence metapopulation stability, as dispersal rates may vary among age classes (Hastings, 1992;de Castro et al, 2006). As de Castro et al (2006) pointed out, this effect is however dependent on conditions outside which our conclusions remain valid.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Metapopulation Density-independencementioning
confidence: 68%
“…Furthermore, we describe local dynamics as scalars, while local populations might have a more detailed structure, especially in age. The interaction between age structure and spatial structure has been shown to influence metapopulation stability, as dispersal rates may vary among age classes (Hastings, 1992;de Castro et al, 2006). As de Castro et al (2006) pointed out, this effect is however dependent on conditions outside which our conclusions remain valid.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Metapopulation Density-independencementioning
confidence: 68%
“…Of course, if migration is density-independent (µ(x) = µ, 0 < µ < 1) we have ϕ (x) = µ, for all x, and thus the hypothesis ϕ (x) < 1 is automatically satisfied showing that density-independent dispersal in single species metapopulation models do not present dispersal driven instabilities (see Rohani et al, 1996;Jansen and Lloyd, 2000). However this is not true in multi-species metapopulation (Rohani and Ruxton, 1999) or in age-structured single species models (De Castro et al, 2005). The same ideas apply in the case of a synchronous periodic orbit of period k, let us say p 1 , p 2 , .…”
Section: The Basic Theorymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…by age or because there are several interacting species (such as predator-prey or host-parasitoid), provided that different age/stage classes or different species differ in dispersal (Hastings 1992;Rohani and Ruxton 1999a,b;Jansen and Lloyd 2000;White and White, 2005;de Castro et al 2006). Concerning the reverse case, cost-free dispersal cannot stabilize the homogeneous equilibrium if it is unstable in absence of dispersal: this holds for density-dependent dispersal (Silva et al 2001) and for multi-species systems (Jansen and Lloyd 2000) as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%