2004
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability issues of covalently and noncovalently bonded peptide subunits

Abstract: Abstract:The present study focuses on important questions associated with modeling of peptide and protein stability.Computing at different levels of theory (RHF, B3LYP) for a representative ensemble of conformers of di-and tripeptides of alanine, we found that the Gibbs Free Energy values correlate significantly with the total electronic energy of the molecules (0.922 Յ R 2 ). For noncovalently attached but interacting peptide subunits, such as [For-NH 2 ] 2 or [For-L-Ala-NH 2 ] 2 , we have found, as expected,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basis set superposition error (BSSE) energy, which is calculated by using the counterpoise procedure87 with H 2 O and C 60 as two fragments of the supermolecule, is roughly around 4.7 kcal mol −1 regardless of the complexes investigated; the value is about 73.3 % of the uncorrected binding energy, and such a large BSSE is not uncommon in other systems 88. 89 The counterpoise‐corrected binding energy, −2.03 kcal mol −1 , matches the RVS and KM/6‐311G interaction energies, −2.12 kcal mol −1 (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis set superposition error (BSSE) energy, which is calculated by using the counterpoise procedure87 with H 2 O and C 60 as two fragments of the supermolecule, is roughly around 4.7 kcal mol −1 regardless of the complexes investigated; the value is about 73.3 % of the uncorrected binding energy, and such a large BSSE is not uncommon in other systems 88. 89 The counterpoise‐corrected binding energy, −2.03 kcal mol −1 , matches the RVS and KM/6‐311G interaction energies, −2.12 kcal mol −1 (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The 6-31G(d) basis set, which is frequently used in the literature, [8,9,12,15,16,29,97,101,111,115,116], has turned out to be a very efficient one for calculating the geometry both at RHF and MP2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any bottom-up approach to the still unsolved protein folding problem [1][2][3][4], the characterization of the conformational behaviour of short peptides [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] constitutes an unavoidable first step. If high accuracy of the treatment is sought, numerically expensive methods must be used to calculate the physical properties of these protein subunits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus increasing the expense and "accuracy" of a calculation may not always converge to the "correct" solution. As a consequence, the quality of the results does not steadily grow with the computational effort invested, but rather there exist certain tradeoffs that render the relation between them more involved [14-16]. Hence, not only the choice of the more efficient QC method for a given problem among the already existing ones, but also the design of novel model chemistries becomes 'more an art than a science' [17], based more on know-how and empiricism than in a set of systematic procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%