2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2012.08.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability measure for a generalized assembly line balancing problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constraints (11) ensure that each task is allocated to exactly one workstation. As for constraints (12), they state that the load of any workstation does not exceed the cycle time.…”
Section: Milp Formulation For Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Constraints (11) ensure that each task is allocated to exactly one workstation. As for constraints (12), they state that the load of any workstation does not exceed the cycle time.…”
Section: Milp Formulation For Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraints (19) and (26) are same as (11) and 18, they provide that each task j is allocated to exactly one workstation from Q (j). Based on Property 1, constraints (20) and (21) state that the processing time deviation ξ j of any task j is set to ρ ∞ , which in turn is not greater than UB ∞ .…”
Section: Milp Formulation For P ∞mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To anticipate the possible changes in the input data, several researchers studied robust formulations of assembly line balancing problems (Xu and Xiao, 2009;Gurevsky et al, 2013b). Other studies were conducted to evaluate the stability of the obtained solutions under variations of task times (Gurevsky et al, 2012(Gurevsky et al, , 2013a. These results help to implement robust line balancing solutions and to keep the initial task assignment to some extent without modifications of the line.…”
Section: Rebalancing Versus Balancingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Gurevsky et al (2012) dealt with the SALBP-E when having task times within intervals and proposed a way to find a compromise between the objective function minimization and a stability ratio (a parameter to reflect the risk aversion coefficient of a decision maker and the conservatism). A related stability study was done in Gurevsky et al (2013) but for the case of an ALB problem where a workstation can have several workplaces, there are exclusion constraints, and the processing times of the tasks can vary during the line life cycle. Hazır and Dolgui (2013) recently presented two robust SALBP-2 models having interval uncertainty for operation times and solved them by a decomposition method and enhancement strategies.…”
Section: Robust Optimization For Assembly Line Balancingmentioning
confidence: 99%