2014
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.l-m2014833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of {4 4 11} ⟨11 11 8⟩ Orientation in a {123} ⟨634⟩ Aluminum Single Crystal Processed by Accumulative Roll Bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another example to show the effect of shear strain change to texture is that the maximum intensity of shear texture was observed at the subsurface [1], but not the exact surface that experienced shear strain reversal after passing the neutral point. Moreover, a close inspection of all four reports [22][23][24][25] concerning ARB processed single crystals revealed another type of texture transition that has not been reported, as shown in Fig.10. The positions that texture reversal (rotating toward the initial orientation, but not transitioning from shear to rolling texture) occurred were marked by 'Rev' in Fig.10, and where these positons came from in the last cycle were also marked by brackets.…”
Section: Texture and Microstructure Evolution In Arbmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another example to show the effect of shear strain change to texture is that the maximum intensity of shear texture was observed at the subsurface [1], but not the exact surface that experienced shear strain reversal after passing the neutral point. Moreover, a close inspection of all four reports [22][23][24][25] concerning ARB processed single crystals revealed another type of texture transition that has not been reported, as shown in Fig.10. The positions that texture reversal (rotating toward the initial orientation, but not transitioning from shear to rolling texture) occurred were marked by 'Rev' in Fig.10, and where these positons came from in the last cycle were also marked by brackets.…”
Section: Texture and Microstructure Evolution In Arbmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It is worth noting that the ARB in Refs. [22][23][24] was conducted under lubricated conditions, in which the variation of shear strain through the thickness is very low [1,5] and a uniform distribution of texture was expected [1,26]. The positions of texture reversal in Fig.10 are not only limited to the centre.…”
Section: Texture and Microstructure Evolution In Arbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being able to access the former (intra-grain deformation) means the CPFEM model can simulate the deformation texture in (strongly anisotropic) single crystals that is the material used in this study. Non-uniform through-thickness deformation and cutting-stacking in ARB would result in misorientation angles at the bonded interfaces 15,16 , as shown later in this study, and the deformation behaviour at the interfacial boundaries can be simulated by the CPFEM model because of its capability to access inter-grain interaction 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In Dev20 and Dev45, the activated slip systems are supposed to be different from grain to grain due to the greatly scattered initial orientations and strong grain-interaction. It is believed that the strong grain interaction is responsible for the large crystal rotation angles (>15°) in Dev20 and Dev45 (Fig.5d), since the crystal rotation angle is usually below 15° for deformed single crystals that have no grain-interaction [11,[45][46][47], i.e., uniform initial orientations, and moreover, the crystal rotation angles in the inner grain, caused by initial orientation, is also at the level of 15° (Fig.3d). In Dev20, 29.3%, 34% and 36.7% of the 11200 elements have RD, ND and TD as the main rotation axis (Fig.9b), respectively, and the crystal rotations about the three axes are comparable ( Fig.5c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%