2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(01)00523-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of massive cosmological gravitons

Abstract: We analyze the physics of massive spin 2 fields in (A)dS backgrounds and exhibit that: The theory is stable only for masses m 2 ≥ 2Λ/3, where the conserved energy associated with the background timelike Killing vector is positive, while the instability for m 2 < 2Λ/3 is traceable to the helicity 0 energy. The stable, unitary, partially massless theory at m 2 = 2Λ/3 describes 4 propagating degrees of freedom, corresponding to helicities (±2, ±1) but contains no 0 helicity excitation.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
254
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
254
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Close to this limit, we cannot make any robust conclusions regarding stability from a perturbative analysis alone. This limit has qualitative similarities to the partially massless limit for massive gravity in de Sitter [35,36], aswell as the chiral limit of topologically massive gravity 5 in AdS [37,38], and the zero tension limit of DGP self-acceleration [31 -33]. In each case there is a ghost whose kinetic term seems to disappear [35,37,33] in the appropriate limit and a more careful analysis is required to identify any left over degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Close to this limit, we cannot make any robust conclusions regarding stability from a perturbative analysis alone. This limit has qualitative similarities to the partially massless limit for massive gravity in de Sitter [35,36], aswell as the chiral limit of topologically massive gravity 5 in AdS [37,38], and the zero tension limit of DGP self-acceleration [31 -33]. In each case there is a ghost whose kinetic term seems to disappear [35,37,33] in the appropriate limit and a more careful analysis is required to identify any left over degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In each case there is a ghost whose kinetic term seems to disappear [35,37,33] in the appropriate limit and a more careful analysis is required to identify any left over degrees of freedom. For massive gravity in de Sitter, the dangerous mode genuinely disappears [36], whereas in the latter two cases the ghost mixes with another mode, such that one ghost-like degree of freedom remains [38,33]. We would need a direct analysis beyond the scope of this paper to see what happens in the exact Chern-Simons limit of EGB gravity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the analysis of tachyonic instabilities in dS 4 is complicated by the fact that the naive Hamiltonian corresponding to the wave operator in (4) has an explicit time-dependence from f (t) and is therefore not conserved. The operator corresponding to the actual conserved energy is manifestly positive inside the de Sitter horizon for any m 2 > 0, as shown in [17]. This is referred to as a "mild" tachyonic instability in the last reference in [4]; for our purposes we will not call such modes tachyons, reserving that name for cases such as m 2 < 0 in (4) which resemble tachyons in flat space.…”
Section: A De Sitter Ghostsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…FRW reference metric: The quadratic action (2.2) is also known to be free of the Boulware-Deser ghost instability when f µν is a de Sitter or anti de Sitter metric [15,16,17,18], or more generally, an FRW [19,20,21] metric 1 . However, consistent non-linear extensions of such quadratic actions had so far remained undetermined.…”
Section: General Structure Of Non-linear Massive Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%