Background/objectives
We compared the ex vivo haemostatic capacity of RTFP24 with FFP upon thawing and >24 h post‐thaw. We included thrombin generation (TG) as few studies had compared global haemostatic function, and most did not directly compare RTFP24 with FFP >24 h post‐thaw.
Materials/methods
Twenty units each of RTFP24 and FFP were measured for coagulation factors and thrombin generation upon thawing (D0) and 4 days post‐thaw (D4). Labile factors were also measured from D1 to D3. 10 single cryoprecipitate units were each prepared from FFP and RTFP24, and measured for FXIII, FVIII and fibrinogen at D0.
Results
At D0, RTFP24 was comparable to FFP except for lower FV, protein S, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and higher FXIII. These differences were likely clinically insignificant since 95% and 80% of RTFP24 met our laboratory's reference ranges for FV/protein S and ETP, respectively. There were no differences between RTFP24‐ and FFP‐derived cryoprecipitate.
At D4, RTFP24 was comparable to FFP except for lower FV, ETP, and higher FXI and FXIII. More RTFP24 than FFP had ETP lower than our laboratory's reference range (45% vs 15%). Multiple coagulation factors and all TG parameters declined from their respective baselines. The percentage declines were comparable or less in RTFP24, except for protein C, fibrinogen and time to peak.
Conclusion
RTFP24 and FFP, and their derived cryoprecipitate have comparable haemostatic capacity upon thawing. RTFP24 has poorer TG potential than FFP >24 h post‐thaw, not supporting universal extension of RTFP24's shelf life except to facilitate urgent transfusions for massive haemorrhage.