2017
DOI: 10.1177/0142331217697787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization of linear time-varying systems using proportional-derivative state feedback

Abstract: This paper presents the stabilization approach for linear time-varying continuous-time systems using proportional-derivative (PD) state feedback control. The solvability conditions for the problem are considered. The general analytical expressions for the PD controller gains are derived, which describe the available degrees of freedom offered by PD state feedback. The non-uniqueness of the controller gains is utilized to obtain closed-loop systems with small gain elements. Two numerical examples are introduced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the introduction of ρ ¯ models a randomly occurring gain perturbation. When ρ ¯ 0 , the non-fragile controller becomes a common fragile controller proposed by Abdelaziz (2018); when ρ ¯ ( 0 , 1 ) , the controller perturbation randomly occurs; when ρ ¯ = 1 , the controller becomes a common non-fragile controller proposed by Shi et al (2015). Considering these three cases, the controller in this paper is more general than those in the references.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, the introduction of ρ ¯ models a randomly occurring gain perturbation. When ρ ¯ 0 , the non-fragile controller becomes a common fragile controller proposed by Abdelaziz (2018); when ρ ¯ ( 0 , 1 ) , the controller perturbation randomly occurs; when ρ ¯ = 1 , the controller becomes a common non-fragile controller proposed by Shi et al (2015). Considering these three cases, the controller in this paper is more general than those in the references.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similar to the earlier continuous time treatment, the discrete time optimal state feedback controller gain matrix s K can be achieved as (26) using the matrix P that minimizes the discrete quadratic cost function (24). Therefore we have: (26) This gives the control law as (27): (27) Using (23)…”
Section: G I a H B A I B A I A I B B (22)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimum weight selection has also been extended for the noisy tracking (integral) problem using linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control with loop transfer recovery (LTR) for improved stability margins [24]. Also, optimal statefeedback PD controller design has been previously studied with minimum norm controller gain to reduce noise amplification in [25], [26], [27]. But previous literatures shown above, do not provide the transformation to directly map time domain specifications (usually adopted in dominant pole placement design) onto the discrete time LQR weights, which is the main contribution of this paper over existing literatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For LTV systems, people have made a series of research results. [9][10][11] In the field of observer design, Trabet et al 12 presented a constructive method to ensure the synergy of observation errors in the new coordinate system to design interval observers. Zhang et al 13 designed an improved high-gain adaptive observer for a class of LTV systems with parameter uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%