2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2004.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilized finite element schemes with LBB-stable elements for incompressible flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the progress of the SUPG/PSPG method in theory and application, an essential drawback of this method is -in particular for higher order interpolations -that various terms need to be added to the weak formulation to guarantee the consistency of the method in a strong way (Galerkin orthogonality holds for smooth solutions). Residual-based stabilisation methods which use inf-sup stable pairs of elements reduce the number of terms which have to be added to the Galerkin formulation [17,33]. However, an additional coupling term between velocity and pressure makes their analysis difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the progress of the SUPG/PSPG method in theory and application, an essential drawback of this method is -in particular for higher order interpolations -that various terms need to be added to the weak formulation to guarantee the consistency of the method in a strong way (Galerkin orthogonality holds for smooth solutions). Residual-based stabilisation methods which use inf-sup stable pairs of elements reduce the number of terms which have to be added to the Galerkin formulation [17,33]. However, an additional coupling term between velocity and pressure makes their analysis difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the parameters δ K = h 2 K and τ K = 1 is carried out according to [7] or [9], where h K denotes the local element length.…”
Section: Topical Problems Of Fluid Mechanics 9 ______________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the parameters δ K = h 2 K and τ K = 1 is carried out according to [5] or [13], where h K denotes the local element length. Then the stabilized discrete problem at a time instant t = t n+1 reads: Find U = (u, p) ∈ W h × Q h , p := p n+1 , u := u n+1 , such that u satisfies approximately the conditions (3 a-b) and…”
Section: The Discrete Formulation Contains the Galerkin Terms Definedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aerodynamical lift force and the aerodynamical moment in equations (4) are extrapolated from the previous time levels, i.e., the approximations L n , M n , L n−1 , M n−1 are assumed to be computed using (5) and the values of u n , p n , u n−1 , p n−1 . The extrapolations of the aerodynamical lift force and the aerodynamical moment are used, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%