2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilizer-free poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles for multimodal biomedical probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated that PLGA-PEI NPs is a carrier for drug delivery. 17,18 Accordingly, PLGA-PEI-TAX-S3SI was developed to improve cancer treatment. More PLGA-PEIOre TAX NPs were taken up by A549 and A549/T12 cells compared to free Oregon Green paclitaxel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been demonstrated that PLGA-PEI NPs is a carrier for drug delivery. 17,18 Accordingly, PLGA-PEI-TAX-S3SI was developed to improve cancer treatment. More PLGA-PEIOre TAX NPs were taken up by A549 and A549/T12 cells compared to free Oregon Green paclitaxel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthesizing stabilizer-free and biodegradable PLGA NPs was previously successful when significant amounts of drugs could be encapsulated in PLGA NPs , 100 nm in diameter. 17,18 One advantage of PLGA NPs is that they can be directly coated with cationic polymers, such as polyethylenimine (PEI), enabling them to carry siRNA on their surfaces through electrostatic interactions. 19,20 Therefore, PLGA-PEI NPs could be used as a carrier that integrates anticancer drugs (inner part) and agents to reduce chemoresistance, eg, siRNA (outer layer).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoparticle size is significant, not only in determining the release profile and degradation manners, but also in determining the efficacy of the therapeutic agent in terms of tissue penetration and cellular uptake (Gaumet et al, 2008;Dinarvand et al, 2011). Particle size, size distribution and morphology determined by Dynamic light scattering or photon correlation spectroscopy (Govender et al, 1999;Fonseca et al, 2002;Cheng et al, 2008), Scanning electron microscopy (Mu and Feng, 2003;Ricci-Júnior and Marchetti, 2006;Esmaeili et al, 2008b), transmission electron microscopy (Panyam et al, 2003;Mo and Lim, 2005;Yang et al, 2007) and Atomic force microscopy (Ravi Dong and Feng, 2005;Song et al, 2006).…”
Section: Nanoparticle Characterization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also desirable to maintain a steady rate of infusion of the drug into the tumor to maximize exposure to dividing cells, resulting in tumor regression. 41,48,49 Scanning electron microscopy 28,50,51 Transmission electron microscopy [52][53][54] Atomic force microscopy [55][56][57] …”
Section: Plga Nanoparticles For Drug Delivery To Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%