2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40571-016-0106-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable algorithm for event detection in event-driven particle dynamics: logical states

Abstract: Following the recent development of a stable event-detection algorithm for hard-sphere systems, the implications of more complex interaction models are examined. The relative location of particles leads to ambiguity when it is used to determine the interaction state of a particle in stepped potentials, such as the square-well model. To correctly predict the next event in these systems, the concept of an additional state that is tracked separately from the particle position is introduced and integrated into the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the motion of each individual particle is obtainable analytically between these events, the scheme becomes event-driven, where each algorithmic step is a search for the next event. Reformulating the general tracking algorithm as a search for the next event has two benefits: First, recent improvements in the robustness of the event detection [30,31] can now be integrated directly into the particle tracking routine, which is discussed in the next section. Second, it allows the consistent extension of the algorithm to handle complex composite objects, which we explore further in Section 4.…”
Section: Event-driven Particle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the motion of each individual particle is obtainable analytically between these events, the scheme becomes event-driven, where each algorithmic step is a search for the next event. Reformulating the general tracking algorithm as a search for the next event has two benefits: First, recent improvements in the robustness of the event detection [30,31] can now be integrated directly into the particle tracking routine, which is discussed in the next section. Second, it allows the consistent extension of the algorithm to handle complex composite objects, which we explore further in Section 4.…”
Section: Event-driven Particle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to these difficulties, an alternative approach for handling intersections is taken. The concept of the logical state is introduced by the authors in a previous work [31] to distinguish captured and uncaptured square-well particles in EDPD. It is here applied to CSG modeling in order to determine whether a tracked particle is located within a given CSG primitive or not without relying on the relative position on the particle.…”
Section: Logical States For Particle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also affect the prediction of the positions of the colliding spheres at the time of impact, which results either in spheres overlapping or in positioning of spheres at a small distance from each other or from the wall, at the time of collision. The sphere overlapping case is extremely problematic [22,27], since the particles have numerically entered the infinite energy hard-core [27]. Errors resulting from → r ij ≥ R i + R j do not affect the stability of the algorithm.…”
Section: Sphere Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the EDMD approach is more suitable for simulating discrete interaction potentials, with the ability to provide quantitative predictions [40], [41]. Fig.…”
Section: Event-driven Molecular Dynamics Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%