2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2018.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable fuzzy control and observer via LMIs in a fermentation process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the transfer state matrices are defined as i ∈ R 3×3 , and the observer gains are the matrices i ∈ R 3×1 . To confirm linear matrix inequalities, a change in variables is done to have the necessary properties [14], the common matrix is positive definite and symmetric. The matrix found to stability holds was: ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, the transfer state matrices are defined as i ∈ R 3×3 , and the observer gains are the matrices i ∈ R 3×1 . To confirm linear matrix inequalities, a change in variables is done to have the necessary properties [14], the common matrix is positive definite and symmetric. The matrix found to stability holds was: ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 3, the estimated errors are presented. In the intermediate concentration estimation, the error must be improved if the relative error criterion is taken into consideration, and also the ITAE (28) because the final error seems to be large [14]. Both criteria are shown in a relative way, dividing by the maxima values to have a better idea about the observer performance because different concentration magnitudes were obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In practice, many engineering systems are subject to hard-limitations in their inputs due to physical constraints, such as power systems (Soliman and Yousef, 2015), DC-DC converters (Moreno-Valenzuela and Guzman-Guemez, 2016), fermentation processes (Márquez-Vera et al, 2018), and aircraft systems (Wu et al, 2000). These systems require some additional conditions in the design phase, that is, taking into account control constraints while ensuring stability under a certain level of performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observer–controller methods for T–S fuzzy systems can be categorised as two cases according to the property of premise variables. The first case refers to known premise variables (KPVs) as in [1416]; the second case refers to the unknown premise variables (UPVs), for this situation, the membership functions also depend on the estimated premise variables [17]. Since the UPV case is a more general situation in real engineering applications, it has drawn much more attention in recent years: stability conditions of the observer–controller are derived separately based on the Lipschitz hypothesis in [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%