2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable isotope fingerprint of open-water evaporation losses and effective drainage area fluctuations in a subarctic shield watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean E/I ratios ranged from 0.20 to 0.51 in samples taken from different locations on the lake, which are consistent with relatively high evaporation rates relative to inflow in lakes [41]. Although the E/I values vary between δ 2 H and δ 18 O, they were linearly correlated with one another (with an R 2 value of 0.72), and differences between E/I values calculated with δ 2 H and δ 18 O are common studies on evaporative loss [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. In general, the values calculated using δ 18 O (in this case, ranging between 0.20 and 0.33; Table 3) are considered more reliable than those calculated using δ 2 H [40,41], and are used below.…”
Section: Evaporative Loss Calculations and Their Uncertaintysupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean E/I ratios ranged from 0.20 to 0.51 in samples taken from different locations on the lake, which are consistent with relatively high evaporation rates relative to inflow in lakes [41]. Although the E/I values vary between δ 2 H and δ 18 O, they were linearly correlated with one another (with an R 2 value of 0.72), and differences between E/I values calculated with δ 2 H and δ 18 O are common studies on evaporative loss [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. In general, the values calculated using δ 18 O (in this case, ranging between 0.20 and 0.33; Table 3) are considered more reliable than those calculated using δ 2 H [40,41], and are used below.…”
Section: Evaporative Loss Calculations and Their Uncertaintysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In Equations (4) and (6), ε is a "total isotope fractionation factor, equal to the sum of the equilibrium isotope fractionation factor (ε + ) and the kinetic isotope fractionation factor (ε k )" [39]:…”
Section: Estimation Of Evaporative Loss Based On the Stable Isotope Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When interpreting isotopic signatures, however, it is also important to consider influences that may modify the isotopic composition of ingestion waters prior to their consumption by animals. These include changing seasonality of rainfall (Rozanski et al, 1993), and the evaporative enrichment of surface and leaf waters, which is primarily controlled by ambient aridity rather than ambient temperature (Dongmann et al, 1974;Gibson and Reid, 2010). Surface waters c.7‰ higher in δ 18 O are known from cold arid environments (Gibson and Reid, 2010), while enrichment of leaf waters can be much greater, elevating δ 18 O by over 20‰ relative to surface water in some instances (Dongmann et al, 1974).…”
Section: Proxymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, these findings can be used to place ecological changes in other lakes proximate to Giant Mine, as well as other mining-impacted regions globally, in the context of an ecosystem highly impacted by metal(loid) exposure. ), approximately 4 km north of the city of Yellowknife [33,34]. The small (less than 5 ha) catchment of Pocket Lake includes an exposed bedrock upland and a soil-filled valley to the south that drains the exposed outcrop into Pocket Lake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%