2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable isotope probing: Technical considerations when resolving 15N-labeled RNA in gradients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conceptually, a dual 13 C and 15 N SIP experiment might be the ideal way to address the known interactions between C and N cycles (Hessen et al, 2004) at the individual taxon level. While 13 C SIP has become part of the standard microbial ecology toolkit, 15 N SIP has been less widely applied (Wawrik et al, 2009(Wawrik et al, , 2012Gallagher et al, 2010;Andeer et al, 2012) and is a more challenging procedure requiring at least 30 atm% 15 N enrichment for DNA or more for 15 N RNA SIP (Buckley et al, 2007;Addison et al, 2010). A new approach to SIP, Chip-SIP, circumvents some of the difficulties of separating 15 N DNA and RNA in a density gradient by separating microbial community RNA on a phylogenetic microarray for subsequent isotopic analysis with a Cameca NanoSIMS 50 (Cameca, Gennevilliers, France), an imaging secondary ion mass spectrometer (Mayali et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptually, a dual 13 C and 15 N SIP experiment might be the ideal way to address the known interactions between C and N cycles (Hessen et al, 2004) at the individual taxon level. While 13 C SIP has become part of the standard microbial ecology toolkit, 15 N SIP has been less widely applied (Wawrik et al, 2009(Wawrik et al, , 2012Gallagher et al, 2010;Andeer et al, 2012) and is a more challenging procedure requiring at least 30 atm% 15 N enrichment for DNA or more for 15 N RNA SIP (Buckley et al, 2007;Addison et al, 2010). A new approach to SIP, Chip-SIP, circumvents some of the difficulties of separating 15 N DNA and RNA in a density gradient by separating microbial community RNA on a phylogenetic microarray for subsequent isotopic analysis with a Cameca NanoSIMS 50 (Cameca, Gennevilliers, France), an imaging secondary ion mass spectrometer (Mayali et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the content of nitrogen in RNA is approximately 2.5 times less than carbon, it presents the difficulty of a lower density gain after a 15 N pulse. Addison et al (2010) observed that 15 Nlabelled RNA increased in buoyant density compared to unlabelled RNA when centrifuged individually, but not when centrifuged together. Similarly, labelled RNA extracted from a paper mill effluent microcosm after a 15 N 2 pulse, showed a limited separation by density centrifugation in CsTFA.…”
Section: Rna-stable Isotope Probing (Rna-sip)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Nitrogen-fixing activity has also been reported in a number of pulp and paper aerated lagoon systems (Gauthier et al 2000;Yu & Mohn 2001;Smith et al 2003), including the two New Zealand kraft mills (Clark et al 1997;Addison et al 2007Addison et al , 2009Bowers et al 2008). Another useful ''rule-ofthumb'' would be the BOD:N ratio at which a wastewater could be considered suitable for nitrogen-fixing treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%