1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3697(97)00055-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stacking nature of graphene layers in carbon nanotubes and nanofibres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the accurate determination of diffraction (002) however the three-dimensional ordering seems to be lack even after annealing at 2800°C. Considering the small diameter of MWNTs (ranging from 20 to 60 nm) in this study, the large curvature of the graphene sheet could might one of reason for the lack of three-dimensional stacking fidelity [17].…”
Section: Effect Of Annealing Temperaturementioning
confidence: 92%
“…By the accurate determination of diffraction (002) however the three-dimensional ordering seems to be lack even after annealing at 2800°C. Considering the small diameter of MWNTs (ranging from 20 to 60 nm) in this study, the large curvature of the graphene sheet could might one of reason for the lack of three-dimensional stacking fidelity [17].…”
Section: Effect Of Annealing Temperaturementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Through the introduction of dopants in graphitic systems (93), or the DRESSELHAUS Figure 18 TEM picture of the broken portion of an as-grown nanofiber cross section. The nanotube core is exposed (91). application of high pressures (94), larger amounts of Li may be accommodated into these carbon structures.…”
Section: Carbon For Battery Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2a shows the XRD patterns of SSC, S, and S/SSC composite. The synthesized SSC displays a strong diffraction peak at around 26°, which can be ascribed to the (002) reflection of carbon [21]. The S/SSC composite gives obvious peaks at 23.1°, 25.9°, 27.8°, 28.7°, 31.5°, 37.1°, 42.8°, 47.8°, and 51.3°, which are typical signals from orthorhombic sulfur (JCPDS #08-0247) [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%