1990
DOI: 10.1093/elt/44.2.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staff/student participation in course evaluation: a procedure for improving course design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subjects consist of two groups: the students who take English for Medical Purposes (EMP) and the instructors who teach the current syllabus. Referring to these types of students, Celani et al (1988), and Sharp (1990) stated that it is more successful to involve both instructors and their students in building up the syllabus, stressing their views and perceptions about syllabus design and within their needs.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects consist of two groups: the students who take English for Medical Purposes (EMP) and the instructors who teach the current syllabus. Referring to these types of students, Celani et al (1988), and Sharp (1990) stated that it is more successful to involve both instructors and their students in building up the syllabus, stressing their views and perceptions about syllabus design and within their needs.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asking learners to relate their thoughts about their language learning experiences gives rise to some confusion as to whether they are being asked about their perceptions (e.g., Block, 1994Block, , 1996Leki, 1995), their attitudes (e.g., Gardner, 1983;Harley et al, 1990;Smit, 1994), or their evaluations (Murphy, 1993;Sharp, 1990). In this study I use perception to mean a "process of apprehending through sensory input" (Holahan, 1982, p. 24) the teaching/learning situation in which learners find themselves, particularly the language teaching/learning activities that they encounter.…”
Section: The Study: Background Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the questionnaires, the highest degree of improvement in the language skills was reported with the writing skills and the lowest with the listening skills, which has been also supported with the insights from the teacher and student interviews. Similarly, Sharp (1990) also reported that students experienced problems with their listening skills development in his evaluation of a four-month English course aiming to upgrade the English level of students for entering a university faculty. In the same vein, the results of Yel's (2009) evaluation for the English high school curricula revealed students' needs that are related to reading and writing skills were met more than their listening and speaking skills.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%