Stage-Gate Hybridization Beyond Agile: Conceptual Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda

Cocchi, Nicolò; Dosi, Clio; Vignoli, Matteo

doi:10.1109/tem.2023.3282269

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 98 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many manufacturing companies use stage-gate based models for following-up progress of projects [23]. Cocchi, et al [24] highlight that stage-gate hybridization is becoming progressively popular among manufacturing organizations that integrate iterative methodologies such as agile into the linear stage-gate process to create hybrid development models and face higher uncertainty. Also, Brosseau, et al [25] discuss that traditional organizations are built around a static, siloed, structural hierarchy, whereas agile organizations are characterized as a network of teams operating in rapid learning and decision-making cycles.…”

Section: Production System Development As a Process And Way Of Workingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Paradoxes in the Digital Transformation of Production Systems

Ahlskog,

Granlund,

Badasjane

et al. 2024

Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital transformation of production systems is a challenging task that demands radical responses from existing organizations. During the digital transformation of productions systems tensions occur that need to be managed and the purpose of this paper is to identify paradoxes in the digital transformation of production systems. Paradox theory has been applied as an analytical framework when identifying digital transformation paradoxes and tensions. A case study has been conducted and two manufacturing companies’ digitalization projects have been studied and analyzed in combination with data from workshops around digital transformation. The results were mapped into four types of paradoxes: organizing, performing, belonging, and learning. We conclude that the identified tensions are intertwined, and a major tension is the degree of standardization of technologies (standardization vs customization) and a more agile way of working (learning by doing vs learning before) doing is a trend within the digital transformation of production system. Our findings are relevant to operations managers and others interested in tensions during the digital transformation of production systems.

show abstract

Section: Production System Development As a Process And Way Of Workingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Paradoxes in the Digital Transformation of Production Systems

Ahlskog,

Granlund,

Badasjane

et al. 2024

Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

An adoption framework for agile new product development using hybrid RBWM-ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC approach

Palsodkar,

Nagare,

Pansare

et al. 2024

JM2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Agile new product development (ANPD) attracts researchers and practitioners by its ability to rapidly reconfigure products and related processes to meet the needs of emerging markets. To increase ANPD adoption, this study aims to identify ANPD enablers (ANPDEs) and create a structural framework that practitioners can use as a quick reference. Design/methodology/approach Initially, a comprehensive literature review is conducted to identify ANPDEs, and a structural framework is developed in consultation with an expert panel using a hybrid robust best–worst method interpretive structural modeling (ISM). During the ISM process, the interactions between the ANPDEs are investigated. The ISM result is used as input for fuzzy Matrice d’Impacts croises-multiplication appliqúean classment means cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification (MICMAC) analysis to investigate enablers that are both strong drivers and highly dependent. Findings The study’s findings show that four ANPDEs are in the low-intensity cluster and thus are excluded during the structural frame development. ISM output shows that “Strong commitment to NPD/top management support,” “Availability of resources,” “Supplier commitment/capability” and “Systematic project planning” are the important ANPDEs. Based on their driving and dependence power, the clusters formed during the fuzzy MICMAC approach show that 16 ANPDEs appear in the dependent zone, one ANPDE in the linkage zone and 14 ANPDEs in the driving zone. Practical implications This research has intense functional consequences for researchers and practitioners within the industry. Industry professionals require a conservative focus on the established ANPDEs during ANPD adoption. Management has to carefully prepare a course of action to avoid any flop during ANPD adoption. Originality/value The framework established is a one-of-a-kind study that provides an integrated impression of important ANPDEs. The authors hope that the suggested structural framework will serve as a blueprint for scholars working in the ANPD domain and will aid in its adoption.

show abstract

Designing Prototypes to Encourage Customer Cocreation in the Iterative Process: The Moderating Effects of Demand and Technological Uncertainties

Song,

Wei

2024

IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stage-Gate Hybridization Beyond Agile: Conceptual Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda

Cited by 5 publications

References 98 publications

Paradoxes in the Digital Transformation of Production Systems

Paradoxes in the Digital Transformation of Production Systems

An adoption framework for agile new product development using hybrid RBWM-ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC approach

Designing Prototypes to Encourage Customer Cocreation in the Iterative Process: The Moderating Effects of Demand and Technological Uncertainties

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About