1983
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90492-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stage IB cervical carcinoma and pregnancy: Report of 49 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
4

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Prognosis of early cervical cancer seems to be similar to non-pregnant women [6,7]. However, rapid cancer progression is also reported [1,8,9]. Only operative (laparoscopic) lymphadenectomy provides exact knowledge of lymph node involvement as the most important prognostic factor, but is a surgical challenge in pregnant patients [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prognosis of early cervical cancer seems to be similar to non-pregnant women [6,7]. However, rapid cancer progression is also reported [1,8,9]. Only operative (laparoscopic) lymphadenectomy provides exact knowledge of lymph node involvement as the most important prognostic factor, but is a surgical challenge in pregnant patients [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that the serious complication rate in CRH is lower than that of radiation therapy (6.7 vs. 28.8%) [6]. However, compared to RH for nonpregnant women, heavier blood loss during surgery (1750 vs. 777 ml) and a higher transfusion rate (75 vs. 54%) were also reported [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRH has the benefit of incurring fewer complications than radiation therapy [6], but heavy blood loss during CRH is a major surgical complication [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrospective studies with small patient numbers showed that only 5% (4/76) of pregnant patients died of cervical cancer after postponing therapy for an average of 16 weeks, indicating the satisfactory safety profile of postponed therapy, especially for early-stage tumor (Lee et al, 1981;Takushi et al, 2002;Hunter et al, 2008). Postponed therapy for stage IB1 cancer patients did not promote tumor recurrence in cases with no pelvic lymph node metastasis visible by laparoscopy (Nisker and Shubat, 1983;Greer et al, 1989;Alouini et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2008). Furthermore, it has been reported that tumor growth can be well controlled by neoadjuvant chemotherapy with little adverse effects on pregnancy (Marana et al, 2001;Caluwaerts et al, 2006;Boyd et al, 2009;Chun et al, 2010;Favero et al, 2010;Rabaiotti et al, 2010;Smyth et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%