Purpose: A clinical trial was designed to test the hypothesis that a psychological intervention could reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. Newly diagnosed regional breast cancer patients (n = 227) were randomized to the intervention-with-assessment or the assessment-only arm. The intervention had positive psychological, social, immune, and health benefits, and after a median of 11 years the intervention arm was found to have reduced the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.55; P = 0.034). In follow-up, we hypothesized that the intervention arm might also show longer survival after recurrence. If observed, we then would examine potential biobehavioral mechanisms.Experimental Design: All patients were followed; 62 recurred. Survival analyses included all 62. Upon recurrence diagnosis, those available for further biobehavioral study were accrued (n = 41, 23 intervention and 18 assessment). For those 41, psychological, social, adherence, health, and immune (natural killer cell cytotoxicity, T-cell proliferation) data were collected at recurrence diagnosis and 4, 8, and 12 months later.Results: Intent-to-treat analysis revealed reduced risk of death following recurrence for the intervention arm (hazard ratio, 0.41; P = 0.014). Mixed-effects follow-up analyses with biobehavioral data showed that all patients responded with significant psychological distress at recurrence diagnosis, but thereafter only the intervention arm improved (P values < 0.023). Immune indices were significantly higher for the intervention arm at 12 months (P values < 0.017).Conclusions: Hazards analyses augment previous findings in showing improved survival for the intervention arm after recurrence. Follow-up analyses showing biobehavioral advantages for the intervention arm contribute to our understanding of how improved survival was achieved. Clin Cancer Res; 16(12);
3270-8. ©2010 AACR.Meta-analyses suggest that stress-related psychosocial factors (1) and lower health-related quality of life (2) are associated with poorer cancer survival, with a 13% increase in the hazard ratio (HR) in studies of breast cancer patients (1). In 1994 a randomized controlled trial, the Stress and Immunity Breast Cancer Project (SIBCP), was designed to test the hypothesis that newly diagnosed breast cancer patients receiving a psychological intervention would have a reduced risk of recurrence and breast cancer death compared with patients who were only assessed. A conceptual model guided the development of the clinical trial. The Biobehavioral Model of Cancer Stress and Disease Course (3) proposes that psychological stress leads to disruptions in quality of life, health behaviors, and immunity, which in turn contribute to poorer disease outcomes. It was hypothesized that an intervention designed to reduce emotional distress and improve social adjustment, health behaviors, and adherence might also improve immunity and disease course. Analyses showed that positive intervention effects were achieved across the psychological and immune outcomes at 4 months (4)...