2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.03.1051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staging of esophageal cancer by EUS: staging accuracy revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
32
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the accuracy of EUS for T staging was shown to be no greater than 72%, which was in concordance with Shimpi et al [6], who had similar study settings. Our results could be explained by patient selection bias because we included only patients who were potential candidates for curative surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, the accuracy of EUS for T staging was shown to be no greater than 72%, which was in concordance with Shimpi et al [6], who had similar study settings. Our results could be explained by patient selection bias because we included only patients who were potential candidates for curative surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Findings have shown that EUS has the ability to delineate the individual esophageal layers and accurately assess the depth of tumor invasion [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The staging accuracy of EUS has been well-documented by multiple previous studies to be approximately 61-76% for T staging and 55-90% [24] for N staging depending on whether the lesion is traversable [25][26][27], which is comparable to the accuracy we found in our study in patients who underwent surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. Currently, there is a paucity of PET/CT staging accuracy data; however, our study determined nodal staging accuracy of PET/CT to be 52.0% in our patient subset (N=24) which again likely reflects the difficulty in identifying locoregional adenopathy even with fused PET/ CT imaging as it is difficult to separate a locoregional node from a primary tumor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Imaging methods such as EUS, CT and positron emission tomography (PET) play an important role in TNM staging. Compared with CT and PET, EUS is superior for T and N staging of esophageal cancer [8,9] . Esophagectomy has been traditionally considered the first option for esophageal carcinosarcoma patients [1] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%