2011
DOI: 10.1002/bse.681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder management and sustainability strategies in the French nuclear industry

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. 2 Energy has become a major issue in the agenda of governments, institutions, business firms and the public. Preventing global warming while meeting the world's energy needs is of critical importance to the sustainability of the planet (IES, 2008). However, the demand for non-renewable resources continues to rise with continued population growth further exacerbating the situation. Between 1945… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Henriques and Sadorsky (1999) identified four groups that managers perceive as setting environmental demands: regulatory stakeholders (government and trade associations), organizational stakeholders (customers, suppliers, employees and shareholders), community stakeholders (community groups and environmental organizations) and the media. This list of stakeholders has since been supported by many other studies examining environmental demands from different stakeholder groups (Banerjee and Bonnefous, 2011;Sharma and Henriques, 2005;Delmas and Toffel, 2004): Banerjee and Bonnefous (2011) identified different strategies for addressing supportive stakeholders (such as government and international institutions), obstructive stakeholders (NGOs) and passive stakeholders (the general public). Sharma and Henriques (2005) identified the multiplicity of withholding influences (by regulators and environmental NGOs), usage influences (by customers) and employee influences (through involvement) were identified by managers.…”
Section: Stakeholders' Environmental Demandsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Henriques and Sadorsky (1999) identified four groups that managers perceive as setting environmental demands: regulatory stakeholders (government and trade associations), organizational stakeholders (customers, suppliers, employees and shareholders), community stakeholders (community groups and environmental organizations) and the media. This list of stakeholders has since been supported by many other studies examining environmental demands from different stakeholder groups (Banerjee and Bonnefous, 2011;Sharma and Henriques, 2005;Delmas and Toffel, 2004): Banerjee and Bonnefous (2011) identified different strategies for addressing supportive stakeholders (such as government and international institutions), obstructive stakeholders (NGOs) and passive stakeholders (the general public). Sharma and Henriques (2005) identified the multiplicity of withholding influences (by regulators and environmental NGOs), usage influences (by customers) and employee influences (through involvement) were identified by managers.…”
Section: Stakeholders' Environmental Demandsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, while there are several examples that shed light on malpractice (e.g. Banerjee and Bonnefous (2011) on the French nuclear industry and Owen (2005) on Enron), there are also MNCs that are praised for their excellence, for instance Patagonia (McSpirit, 1999) with its calls for reduced consumption. Whether or not Patagonia has succeeded in actually reducing the overall consumption is another question.…”
Section: Corporate Responsibility and Stakeholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We agree with the authors when they state, "studies on the relation between such controversial industry sectors and CSR are in its infant stage and we do not fully understand why and how firms in controversial industries gain or sneak legitimacy through CSR engagement" (p. 468). However, in recent years in particular, there have been a few studies (Banerjee & Bonnefous 2011;Cai, Jo & Pan 2012;Du & Vieira Jr. 2012;Frynas 2005;Yoon, Gürhan-Canli, & Schwarz 2006;Livesey 2002;Livesey & Kearins 2002;O'Connor & Gronewold 2012;Palazzo & Richter 2005;Slack 2012;Wheeler, Fabig & Boele 2002). Results appear to be counter-intuitive and show that controversial industries do not avoid CSR claims.…”
Section: Responsibility Communication: Controversial Industries and Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The communication of economic responsibilities might be prioritised or marginalised. It might or might not be related to the communication of social and environmental responsibilities (Banerjee & Bonnefous 2011;Humphreys & Brown 2008;O'Connor & Gronewold 2012). Functionalist business research (e.g., Cai, Jo & Pan 2012) tends to underestimate the complexity of these tensions by assuming a kind of natural win-win-relationship: being profitable and being a "good corporate citizen" are claimed to be mutually supportive.…”
Section: Responsibility Communication: Controversial Industries and Cmentioning
confidence: 99%