Stakeholder theory and management: Understanding longitudinal collaboration networks

Abstract

This paper explores the evolution of research collaboration networks in the ‘stakeholder theory and management’ (STM) discipline and identifies the longitudinal effect of co-authorship networks on research performance, i.e., research productivity and citation counts. Research articles totaling 6,127 records from 1989 to 2020 were harvested from the Web of Science Database and transformed into bibliometric data using Bibexcel, followed by applying social network analysis to compare and analyze scientific collaboration networks at the author, institution and country levels. This work maps the structure of these networks across three consecutive sub-periods (t1: 1989–1999; t2: 2000–2010; t3: 2011–2020) and explores the association between authors’ social network properties and their research performance. The results show that authors collaboration network was fragmented all through the periods, however, with an increase in the number and size of cliques. Similar results were observed in the institutional collaboration network but with less fragmentation between institutions reflected by the increase in network density as time passed. The international collaboration had evolved from an uncondensed, fragmented and highly centralized network, to a highly dense and less fragmented network in t3. Moreover, a positive association was reported between authors’ research performance and centrality and structural hole measures in t3 as opposed to ego-density, constraint and tie strength in t1. The findings can be used by policy makers to improve collaboration and develop research programs that can enhance several scientific fields. Central authors identified in the networks are better positioned to receive government funding, maximize research outputs and improve research community reputation. Viewed from a network’s perspective, scientists can understand how collaborative relationships influence research performance and consider where to invest their decision and choices.

Environmental Education Performance Evaluation in a Higher Education Institution

“…Freeman's ( 1984 ) seminal work emphasized the relationships between the organization and the stakeholders as the main unit of analysis and this was the starting point for stakeholder theory. The achievement of organizational goals is possible, according to the theory, through the interconnection of capitalism with ethics and the identification of appropriate management practices (Fares et al 2021 ).…”

Stakeholder-Oriented Firms Have Feelings and Moral Standing Too

“…Stakeholder orientations are also increasingly relevant, as in 2019 181 CEO’s of leading U.S. American firms committed to leading their firms for the benefit of all stakeholders ( Harrison et al, 2020 ). In addition, stakeholder theory is increasingly adopted as a theoretical lens across disciplines and countries ( Laplume et al, 2008 ; Parmar et al, 2010 ; Fares et al, 2021 ). Because of this practical and theoretical relevance, I investigate the effect of a stakeholder vs. profit orientation on moral standing attributions to a firm.…”

Stakeholder engagement variability across public, private and public-private partnership projects: A data-driven network-based analysis

“…The research has also established that capitalism and ethics are inseparable, and managers often need to account for internal and external stakeholders. Because of this, there exists a level of interplay and complexity between focal organizations and their stakeholders [18][19][20]. Studies throughout this time became increasingly concerned with sustainable and ethical value creation.…”