Stakeholder Views of the Factors Affecting the Commercialization of Aviation Biofuels in Europe

Abstract

Biofuels are being advocated by certain sections of the commercial aviation industry as a means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and lowering fossil-fuel dependency within the confines of current aircraft technology and infrastructure. Rising oil prices, increasingly stringent environmental legislation, and continued growth in air travel demand have stimulated the development of renewable lower-carbon fuel alternatives that can act as a substitute for conventional Jet A1 kerosene. However, although biofuels may offer a number of apparent benefits, barriers to widespread commercial uptake and deployment remain, including concerns about competition for feedstocks and impact on global water resources and biodiversity. The processes involved in the uptake of aviation-grade biofuels are not straightforward and there is a need to explore the factors affecting commercial deployment. This paper reports on the findings of a series of in-depth semistructured interviews with key aviation stakeholders in Europe. The research reveals that concerns about the supply of suitable feedstocks, uncertainty surrounding the true life-cycle emissions savings of the fuels, and the perceived lack of policy support are key obstacles that need to be addressed before aviation biofuels can be widely utilized. The research also reveals that the potential inclusion of aviation within the EU Emissions Trading Scheme will create a zero accounting ''loophole'' for biofuel that may uniquely influence the pattern of uptake in the EU vis-à-vis other world markets. Additional key constraints identified include limitations on the supply of suitable feedstocks, concerns about sustainability of the fuels, and uncertain policy support.

Green aviation industry sustainable development towards an integrated support system

“…Governments need to develop new aviation industry environmental policies, acknowledge industrial trends, and understand industrial technologies and the information obtained by research and development institutions. To achieve the sustainable development of the green aviation industry, advanced experiences and lessons from existing related environmental policies (e.g., the noise tax in the Netherlands, the "bubble" policy in the United States, and the EU ETS) should be learned (Shaw, 2001;Girvin, 2009;Anger, 2010;Sgouridis et al, 2011;Gegg et al, 2015). Moreover, the effects of the market economy and the whole industry should be coordinated to promote the green aviation industry sustainable development.…”

Production pathways for renewable jet fuel: a review of commercialization status and future prospects

“…Development of a supportive policy environment is likely to be critical to the successful development and deployment of RJF technologies. 42,[126][127][128][129] initial product testing might require as little as 0.5 liter, extensive engine testing toward the end of the certifi cation process can require up to 650 tonnes (225 00 US gallons) of fuel. 125 Ongoing research ¶ for the RENJET project highlights the diffi culties this fuel requirement presents for RJF developers (unpublished material).…”

Renewable jet fuel supply scenarios in the European Union in 2021–2030 in the context of proposed biofuel policy and competing biomass demand

“…However, the large-scale uptake of RJF has been impeded by the high cost differential between RJF and fossil jet fuel, limited number of commercialized conversion technologies, highly competitive and international character of the aviation industry, and current lack of adequate (policy) incentives (de Jong et al, 2015;Hamelinck et al, 2012;Kousoulidou & Lonza, 2016; Mawhood, Gazis, de Jong, Hoefnagels, & Slade, 2016). The future role of RJF depends on contextual factors, of which the most important ones comprise the regulatory context, the availability of (low-cost) sustainable feedstocks, the commercialization of conversion technologies, and future oil price development (de Jong, Hoefnagels, van Stralen, et al, 2017;Gegg, Ison, & Budd, 2015;IRENA, 2017;Mawhood et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2016).…”