Stalking i inne formy przemocy emocjonalnej. Studium kryminologiczne

Woźniakowska-Fajst, Dagmara

doi:10.31338/uw.9788323536710

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the file research I conducted, men harassed by ex-partners made up only 6% of all the examined cases, which is slightly less than the national court files study where such cases constituted 10% 23 . These results are still similar to the study by L.P. Sheridan and colleagues 24 . A survey of 872 self-defined victims revealed that 8% of the situations involved women stalking men (this number involved victims who were also stalked by people other than ex-partners).…”

Section: Discussion Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Men as victims of post-relationship stalking in Poland

Stachelska¹

2022

PwD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The problem of the crime of stalking around the world is still relevant. The rapid development of new communication tools and the Internet has made it easier than ever before to commit a crime of persistent harassment. Although most of the literature focuses on women as victims due to constantly changing social roles, it is essential to look at the male perspective in that area. The article presents the outline picture of stalking in Poland, emphasizing men as victims of this phenomenon. The paper presents an analysis of the four court cases in which men were victims of post-relationship stalking. It focuses on the female stalker and male victim characteristics, motives of the perpetrator, and modus operandi. The value of the case study shows that the course of persistent harassment of men by women can be just as severe as in female stalking. The paper is enriched with references to international researches and recommendations for adjusting the criminalization of stalking to the male perception of persistent harassment.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Men as victims of post-relationship stalking in Poland

Stachelska¹

2022

PwD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Taip pat pabrėžiama, kad persekiojimo metu vienas asmuo nepaliaujamai (nuolat) kitam asmeniui primeta nepageidaujamą komunikaciją (Aiškinamoji ataskaita, p. 182). Tačiau, remiantis kitų valstybių baudžiamosios atsakomybės nuostatų už persekiojimą analize, persekiojimo nusikaltimo sudėtis apibūdinama įvairiai (pvz., tiek išsamiai arba pakankamai lakoniškai atskleidžiant persekiojimo elgesio variantus, tiek apibūdinant šį nusikaltimą materialiąja arba formaliąja sudėtimi, taip pat numatant kvalifikuotą šio nusikaltimo sudėtį arba privataus kaltinimo reikalavimą ir kt., Van der Aa 2018;Woźniakowska-Fajst 2019). Pažymėtina, kad pastaruoju metu Europos Sąjungos valstybėse, kurios priėmė specialias teisės normas, numatančias baudžiamąją atsakomybę už persekiojimą, ryškėja tendencija, pagal kurią kriminalizuojant persekiojimą svarbu, kad persekiojimo auka būtų patyrusi baimę arba kad būtų pateikiamas įkyraus nepageidaujamo elgesio veiksmų sąrašas (Van der Aa 2018).…”

Section: Persekiojimo Samprataunclassified

The criminalization of stalking and characteristics of court practices in stalking cases in Lithuania

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stalking is considered a serious public health problem as well as a harmful form of victimization often leading to severe consequences for the victim. Although there is still little agreement on the exact definition of stalking, it has been recognized that the core elements of stalking include deliberateness and recurrence of the stalker’s actions as well as victim fear and concern for safety. The main purpose of this article is to debate on the definition of stalking as well as provide the rates of stalking in Lithuania. Authors conclude that stalking refers to a constellation of a diverse range of actions and may include both direct communication with the victim and the use of cyberspace technologies. A rapid development of modern digital technologies leads to a wide variety of complex stalking behavior patterns that makes it complicated to generate an adequate legal response to this phenomenon. The results of a public survey conducted by a research group from the Law Institute of the Centre for Social Sciences in 2021 show that the rates of stalking in Lithuania are comparable to those reported in foreign studies as 17.5% of Lithuanian population have experienced stalking at least once during their lifetime. Stalking by the current or former intimate partner was the most prevalent stalking category, as it comprised nearly 39% of all stalking cases in the state. The article also covers some aspect of court practices in stalking-related cases during the period from 2016 to 2020, before anti-stalking legislation was introduced in Lithuania. By year 2021, when stalking was criminalized in Lithuania, 23 European Union member countries have managed to develop criminal anti-stalking legislation. Another aim of this article is to discuss the way criminal anti-stalking legislation was introduced in Lithuania and compare Lithuanian approach to the legal provisions enacted in other countries. Authors conclude that although the introduction of criminal anti-stalking legislation in Lithuania was an important step towards ensuring victims’ safety, it still may possibly lead to some practical issues during the criminal investigation of stalking cases.

show abstract

“…Brunon Hołyst wskazuje, że motywem działania sprawcy może być nawet chęć dogłębnego poznania kobiety, którą niedawno zobaczył mężczyzna, a także chęć bycia blisko swojego idola-celebryty 23 � Do motywów działania stalkera można zaliczyć nawet konflikty sąsiedzkie, które czasami kończą się uporczywym nękaniem jednej ze stron. Nieporozumienia zachodzą zarówno między osobami, które się nie znają, jak i pomiędzy osobami spokrewnionymi lub spowinowaconymi 24 � Sąd Najwyższy w postanowieniu z 12 grudnia 2013 r. w sprawie III KK 417/13 wskazał, że linią obrony stalkera nie może być żywione do ofiary uczucie, ponieważ miłość, nienawiść, chęć zemsty lub dokuczenia komuś albo złośliwość nie mogą stanowić przyczyn uporczywego nękania 25 � Jak wskazują przeprowadzane badania, zjawisko stalkingu stanowi istotny problem społeczny. Doświadczenie uporczywego nękania ma negatywny wpływ na życie ofiary 26 .…”

unclassified

Przyczyny przestępstwa uporczywego nękania

Jankowska

2023

kpp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Uporczywe nękanie jest przestępstwem współczesnym, które z roku na rok staje się coraz bardziej popularne. Ma ono charakter globalny, ponieważ zmagają się z nim mieszkańcy prawie wszystkich państw na świecie. Głównym celem artykułu jest przedstawienie przyczyn stalkingu oraz wskazanie, że może mieć ono zróżnicowany charakter. Uporczywe nękanie jest przestępstwem, którego ofiary mierzą się z poważnymi konsekwencjami. Dzięki poznaniu przyczyn stalkingu potencjalny pokrzywdzony, którym może zostać każdy, dowie się, jakich sytuacji unikać, a także jak na nie reagować.

show abstract

Stalking i inne formy przemocy emocjonalnej. Studium kryminologiczne

Cited by 8 publications

References 53 publications

Men as victims of post-relationship stalking in Poland

Men as victims of post-relationship stalking in Poland

The criminalization of stalking and characteristics of court practices in stalking cases in Lithuania

Przyczyny przestępstwa uporczywego nękania

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About