2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10809-005-0180-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard and Methodological Provision of the Quality Control of Water

Abstract: Standard papers regulating the quality of waters of different types are considered. Procedures for determining water quality indexes are briefly reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After analysis, the standard deviations ranged from 0.09% to 0.23% and the target pollutant was not detected in the blank samples, which conformed to the stated data processing standards [35,36]. In determining groundwater quality parameters, the recovery indicator was added before the water sample was processed; samples' recovery rates ranged from 84.4 to 95.7%, and the average was 89.4%; moreover, we compiled the standard curve for target objects and the results of the analysis show that the correlation coefficient of the linear equation was over 0.99; all conformed to quality assurance standards for the processing of groundwater [37,38].…”
Section: Human Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After analysis, the standard deviations ranged from 0.09% to 0.23% and the target pollutant was not detected in the blank samples, which conformed to the stated data processing standards [35,36]. In determining groundwater quality parameters, the recovery indicator was added before the water sample was processed; samples' recovery rates ranged from 84.4 to 95.7%, and the average was 89.4%; moreover, we compiled the standard curve for target objects and the results of the analysis show that the correlation coefficient of the linear equation was over 0.99; all conformed to quality assurance standards for the processing of groundwater [37,38].…”
Section: Human Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%