2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9639.2006.00238.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard Deviation for Small Samples

Abstract: Neater representations for variance are given for small sample sizes, especially for 3 and 4. With these representations, variance can be calculated without a calculator if sample sizes are small and observations are integers, and an upper bound for the standard deviation is immediate. Accessible proofs of lower and upper bounds are presented for a broad spectrum of readers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all regression analyses, categorical variables were coded as dummy variables. [21][22][23] Linear regression models were constructed where the Pcalc OSCE scores (dependent variable) were regressed against the main effects of educational condition (primary independent variable) and the demographic variables including age, gender, ethnicity, certified technician training, completion of post-secondary course of study, overall GPA, and percentile PCAT composite. 24,25 Models for both sets of Pcalc OSCE scores (six weeks and six months) were analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all regression analyses, categorical variables were coded as dummy variables. [21][22][23] Linear regression models were constructed where the Pcalc OSCE scores (dependent variable) were regressed against the main effects of educational condition (primary independent variable) and the demographic variables including age, gender, ethnicity, certified technician training, completion of post-secondary course of study, overall GPA, and percentile PCAT composite. 24,25 Models for both sets of Pcalc OSCE scores (six weeks and six months) were analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%