2010
DOI: 10.1177/0040517509357647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard Test Methods Adapted to Better Simulate Fabrics in Use

Abstract: The objective was to adapt Standard test methods for determining properties of apparel fabrics so these properties are a better reflection of fabrics when used in end-products, while retaining a controlled environment and thus allowing fabric comparisons2. Test methods in which properties are compared when fabrics are dry and damp, and/ or in which they are in multiple-layered assemblies have been developed and applied to a range of fabrics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The condition of the water-resistant cover did not appear to affect the measured BFS in test panels exposed to soaking and drying regimes. (Laing et al, 2010;Crow and Osczevski, 1998;Laing et al, 2008). That mass of the test panels increased after soaking and drying exposure cycles in a saline solution was also expected and is likely due to salt crystallising and being trapped within the fabric and panel structure during the drying process.…”
Section: Effect Of Conditioning On Mass Of Panelmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The condition of the water-resistant cover did not appear to affect the measured BFS in test panels exposed to soaking and drying regimes. (Laing et al, 2010;Crow and Osczevski, 1998;Laing et al, 2008). That mass of the test panels increased after soaking and drying exposure cycles in a saline solution was also expected and is likely due to salt crystallising and being trapped within the fabric and panel structure during the drying process.…”
Section: Effect Of Conditioning On Mass Of Panelmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The textile effective density (q ef ) was calculated by weighing a known volume of sample [10,11,[13][14][15], after stabilisation of its moisture content (by exposure to air environment at 20°C and 65% of humidity, for at least 16 h). Finally, the fraction of fibre (e ds ), of retained water (e bw ), and of gas (e c ) were obtained by solving Eqs.…”
Section: ð3:1þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two textiles made of the same type of fibres but with different porosities may have very different thermal performances. Porosity of a textile is usually determined by evaluating fibre and textile densities, the latter being often determined by weighing a specific volume of textile [10,11,[13][14][15][16]. However, depending on the hydrophilic nature of the fibre, it retains more or less water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is known is that wet fabrics are heavier and more inclined to slump. 34 A WRT can be applied to fibres, yarns and fabrics; there can be issues with adhesion, and if treatment is applied to fibres or yarns, the WRT can wear off during the weaving process; thus, the preference is for treating fabrics. WRT fabrics may be stiffer than non-treated fabrics, and interstitial spaces can be partially or fully filled reducing evaporation if the fabrics are used in apparel located next to the skin.…”
Section: Water Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%