Standardised module evaluation surveys in UK higher education: Establishing students’ perspectives

Wiley, Christopher

doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.02.004

Cited by 14 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…College moral education must also pay attention to this difference, study the students' moral development level, teach students according to their needs, and use various methods synthetically. While moral indoctrination is essential in this process, it may lead to a gradual distance between moral 2 Scientific Programming education and the educated [15]. In moral education in colleges and universities, some moral educators, without fully understanding the students' living situation, actual needs, thoughts, and their different needs for morality, regard students as pure objects, ignore the subjective role of students and the differences of students, adopt monologue indoctrination education, and impose moral truth on students, and teachers seem to become the mouthpiece of morality, thus making it difficult for moral education to touch students' souls and obtain value identification, aggravating students' dissatisfaction and disgust for moral education and contradicting moral education from the heart.…”

Section: Current Situation Of College Students' Moral Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Construction of Moral Education Evaluation Model Based on Quality Cultivation of College Students

Xiao-lin

2022

Scientific Programming

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contemporary young college students are greatly impacted in the aspects of moral cognition and moral choice, which results in the weak moral will of some college students, vague moral concepts, and weak ideals and beliefs, which seriously affect the formation and development of college students’ moral quality. Therefore, the moral education evaluation model based on college students’ quality cultivation is constructed. Firstly, the present situation and defects of college students’ quality training are analyzed. Based on this, association rules in data mining method are constructed and introduced to extract valuable knowledge hidden in the data to assist education managers to make effective decisions and improve management level. Finally, the evaluation index is selected and the weighted principal component TOP-SIS model is constructed to realize the evaluation of moral education based on college students’ quality cultivation. The experimental results show that the evaluation results of the model are consistent with the actual situation, high degree of fit and freedom, and good practical performance.

show abstract

Section: Current Situation Of College Students' Moral Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Construction of Moral Education Evaluation Model Based on Quality Cultivation of College Students

Xiao-lin

2022

Scientific Programming

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Gathering and analyzing student perspectives on classroom experiences through student evaluations of teaching (SET) is a common practice within institutions of higher education (Wiley, 2019). There is much to learn from this rich history of practice.…”

Section: Student Perspectives As Valid Assessments Of Effective Teachingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Teachers’ Classroom Management Competency: A Case Study of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System–Secondary

Wallace

Parr

Correnti

2019

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One popular observational instrument to evaluate teaching is the Classroom Assessment Scoring System–Secondary (CLASS-S). Yet, the secondary version of the CLASS poorly discriminates classroom management quality beyond identifying extremely chaotic classrooms with teachers’ scores clustering in the most positive ranges of effectiveness. Studies of adolescents’ perceptions of teachers’ classroom management practices, however, clearly suggest more nuance and complexity. Assuming this discrepancy between results (i.e., lack of differentiation vs. nuanced complexity) might be an artifact of this particular observational protocol rather than a reflection of reality, this study microanalyzed the source material influencing adolescent and adult evaluative assessments of classroom management, using transcripts generated from video viewing sessions. Comparisons between (a) adolescents’ indigenous interpretations, and (b) adults’ trained interpretations of CLASS-S classroom management instructional interactions suggest that adolescents view student engagement and positive climate as particularly relevant to assessments of classroom management, whereas the CLASS-S does not include these as dimensions of effective teaching assessed as part of the Classroom Organization domain.

show abstract

“…Not all students will fill out surveys, a point addressed in literature (Nair et al, 2008;Higher Education Academy, 2016). There is also evidence to suggest that students' course feedback can feature subjectivities and biases (Heffernan, 2021;Wiley, 2019;Stewart, 2015;Gibbs, 2010), while sectoral equivalents such as the UK's National Student Survey (NSS) have received widespread criticism (Huxham et al, 2017;Cheng & Marsh, 2010;Cathcart et al, 2014), with the use of NSS findings described by Yorke (2014) as "naïve" (p. xvi).…”

Section: Information Providermentioning

confidence: 99%

Models for exploring partnership: Introducing sparqs’ student partnership staircase as a reflective tool for staff and students

Varwell¹

2021

IJSaP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A useful way of exploring partnership between staff and students is through visual representations of partnership, where the concept sits alongside other ideas in scales or diagrams. They enable comparison, benchmarking and reflection in a way that is facilitative rather than instructional. Many such tools approach partnership in different ways and can be used in various contexts by staff and students. This article explores some of those tools, and introduces sparqs’ student partnership staircase, a simple tool which places partnership at the top of a four-step scale, prompting conversations about the role that students can and should play in shaping quality and how staff and institutions can enable this. Consideration is given to how the staircase can be used to create mutual learning spaces for staff and students and prompt shared understandings about partnership in quality.

show abstract

Standardised module evaluation surveys in UK higher education: Establishing students’ perspectives

Cited by 14 publications

References 49 publications

Construction of Moral Education Evaluation Model Based on Quality Cultivation of College Students

Construction of Moral Education Evaluation Model Based on Quality Cultivation of College Students

Assessing Teachers’ Classroom Management Competency: A Case Study of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System–Secondary

Models for exploring partnership: Introducing sparqs’ student partnership staircase as a reflective tool for staff and students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About