2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardised neutralising antibody assays are needed for evaluating COVID-19 vaccines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Live-virus plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT), considered the gold standard for measuring Nabs, are cumbersome, expensive and require a biosafety level (BSL) 3 laboratory environment. Furthermore, these assays have suboptimal interlaboratory reproducibility as there is no standardized protocol that is universally used ( 14 16 ). As an alternative to PRNT, the correlation of antibodies directed against the spike RBD measured with routine laboratory assays (“binding” antibodies) could in theory be used to infer protection ( 12 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Live-virus plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT), considered the gold standard for measuring Nabs, are cumbersome, expensive and require a biosafety level (BSL) 3 laboratory environment. Furthermore, these assays have suboptimal interlaboratory reproducibility as there is no standardized protocol that is universally used ( 14 16 ). As an alternative to PRNT, the correlation of antibodies directed against the spike RBD measured with routine laboratory assays (“binding” antibodies) could in theory be used to infer protection ( 12 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of anti-RBD-S1 IgG titers and assumption of 50% vaccine efficacy relied on the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 strain, which could not account for the high evasive capacity of subsequent Omicron VOC spread 38 , 39 . In this regard, the use of an assay for neutralizing activity of vaccine-induced antibody levels would have been optimal, but procedural constraints prevented us from implementing this method of investigation 40 . Finally, although we found a significant difference in the clinical outcome of vaccination, the rate of breakthrough infections is still too low (< 4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to better understand the association among humoral response markers and protection from infection an effort in the harmonization of the results obtained from different laboratories worldwide is needed [12]. Indeed, in the current pandemic a large number of serological tests, based on different technologies and recognizing different epitopes of the S-protein, have been used along with neutralization assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%