2002
DOI: 10.1177/030802260206500303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardised Tests: An Appropriate Way to Measure the Outcome of Paediatric Occupational Therapy?

Abstract: The advent of clinical governance has refocused clinicians on the need to use evidence-based practice, one aspect of which is the identification and measurement of intervention outcomes. Paediatric occupational therapists have traditionally used a variety of standardised tests in their practice and these are often cited as the means by which treatment outcomes are evaluated. However, the tests most frequently used may not be the most appropriate measures of the outcome of occupational therapy. This paper explo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The continued and almost exclusive use of standardised tests (such as the VMI) that measure performance components to demonstrate outcomes in occupational tasks, such as handwriting, is of significant concern (Payne, 2002). Unsworth (2000) reminds us that ‘… when selecting assessments, make sure that they measure change in the attribute or area that is being targeted …’ (p. 151).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continued and almost exclusive use of standardised tests (such as the VMI) that measure performance components to demonstrate outcomes in occupational tasks, such as handwriting, is of significant concern (Payne, 2002). Unsworth (2000) reminds us that ‘… when selecting assessments, make sure that they measure change in the attribute or area that is being targeted …’ (p. 151).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, several of the variables in this study were evaluated using nonstandardized assessment tools. Berninger et al (1997), and Payne (2002) emphasize the importance of using standardized measures to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment interventions. In contrast, Case-Smith (2001) criticizes that most standardized tests assess performance components (such as balance, visual motor skills), rather than actual functional performance (for example, the functional aspects of handwriting) and that they are an inappropriate substitute for functional assessment.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TVPS third edition (TVPS-3) (Martin, 2006) as described in the literature review was chosen for this study because it was the most frequently purchased TVPS on the Irish market (ETC, 2012, personal communication) and one of the most widely used assessments internationally (Rodger et al, 2005;Payne, 2002;Howard, 2002). Therefore, any findings from this study may be considered to have relevance both in Ireland and internationally to contribute to current occupational therapy practice knowledge in this area.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%