Purpose
Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants are at a risk of spontaneous focal intestinal perforation (FIP). Treatment includes supportive care, antibiotics, and drainage with/without surgery. Broad-spectrum antibiotic agents like carbapenems are applied frequently, although their use is not well-supported by the limited evidence of causal pathogens. We hypothesize that the use of carbapenems may not be necessary in VLBW infants with FIP. Our primary objective was to evaluate the antimicrobial use in VLBW infants with FIP in a cohort of the German Neonatal Network (GNN). The secondary objective was to characterize a subset in detail as a benchmark for future targets of stewardship.
Methods
Data on VLBW infants with FIP was collected prospectively within the GNN, a collaboration of 68 neonatal intensive care units (NICU). With regards to the primary objective, patient characteristics and antimicrobial treatment were extracted from the predefined GNN database. To address our secondary objective, an additional on-site assessment of laboratory and microbiological culture results were performed.
Results
In the GNN cohort, 613/21,646 enrolled infants (2.8%) developed FIP requiring surgery. They were frequently treated with carbapenems (500/613 (81.6%)) and vancomycin (497/613 (81.1%)). In a subset of 124 VLBW infants, 77 (72.6%) had proof of gram-positive bacteria in the abdominal cavity, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) predominantly. Despite the low prevalence of gram-negative bacteria (n = 6 (4.8%)), the combination of meropenem and vancomycin was prescribed most frequently (n = 96 (78.0%)).
Conclusion
The use of carbapenems as broad-spectrum antimicrobials agents might not be justified in most VLBW infants with FIP. Knowledge on the development of the neonatal gut microbiota, local resistance patterns and individual microbiological findings should be taken into consideration when implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs).