2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standards and political connections: Evidence from Tunisia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Tunisian economy however suffered from serious structural problems, in particular insufficient job creation matching the skills of its university graduates, as well as entrenched regional inequality of opportunity. Regulatory policies that limited competition especially in sectors where firms politically connected to the Ben-Ali family were most active, corruption, bureaucracy and restrictive labor laws had all dampened economic performance and culminated in the Jasmine revolution in December 2010 to January 2011 (Rijkers et al, 2017;Kruse et al, 2021;World Bank, 2014). Our study captures the period immediately before the revolution (2008) at the time of the international financial crisis, and immediately after (2014), at a time when the political situation had stabilized to some extent, but youth unemployment was still exceptionally high, and economic growth had not yet recovered (Baah-Boateng, 2016;Assaad et al, 2017b;Stampini and Verdier-Chouchane, 2011).…”
Section: Country Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Tunisian economy however suffered from serious structural problems, in particular insufficient job creation matching the skills of its university graduates, as well as entrenched regional inequality of opportunity. Regulatory policies that limited competition especially in sectors where firms politically connected to the Ben-Ali family were most active, corruption, bureaucracy and restrictive labor laws had all dampened economic performance and culminated in the Jasmine revolution in December 2010 to January 2011 (Rijkers et al, 2017;Kruse et al, 2021;World Bank, 2014). Our study captures the period immediately before the revolution (2008) at the time of the international financial crisis, and immediately after (2014), at a time when the political situation had stabilized to some extent, but youth unemployment was still exceptionally high, and economic growth had not yet recovered (Baah-Boateng, 2016;Assaad et al, 2017b;Stampini and Verdier-Chouchane, 2011).…”
Section: Country Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tunisian economy however suffered from serious structural problems, in particular insufficient job creation matching the skills of its university graduates, as well as entrenched regional inequality of opportunity. Regulatory policies that limited competition especially in sectors where firms politically connected to the Ben-Ali family were most active, corruption, bureaucracy and restrictive labor laws had all dampened economic performance and culminated in the Jasmine revolution in December 2010 to January 2011 (Rijkers et al , 2017; Kruse et al. , 2021; World Bank, 2014).…”
Section: Related Literature and Country Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependent variable is the quality change between periods t and t ‐5, which is defined as Δqualityfkct=qualityfkctqualityitalicfkc,t5 Referring to Curzi et al (2015) and Falkowski et al (2019), all explanatory variables are lagged by five years to reduce the potential for endogeneity concerns arising from reverse causality. Here, potential reverse causality describes the event where an association between standards and quality upgrading is not due to direct causality from standards to quality upgrading, but rather because the need for quality upgrading actually results in changes to standards (Kruse et al, 2021); that is, the government targets low‐quality products with more standards for upgrading, so that quality might inversely influence standard‐setting. Standard generation is a time‐consuming process, as it typically takes more than five years from the proposition of a new standard to its final implementation (Blind & Jungmittag, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As firm‐level data have become available in recent years, many studies have begun to examine the effect of agri‐food standards on trade at the firm‐level (e.g. Curzi et al, 2020; Kruse et al, 2021). It is found that compared with larger exporting firms, smaller firms are more affected by restrictive standards in their market entry and exit decisions and more prone to exit the market (Fernandes et al, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper relates to three strands of recent literature. The first is the literature on the economic effects of trade policy (Goldberg and Pavcnik, 2016;De Loecker et al, 2016;Amiti and Konings, 2007;Handley et al, 2020;Fan et al, 2015;Amiti et al, 2019;Handley et al, 2020b;Fajgelbaum et al, 2020) and non-tariff measures in particular (Ederington and Ruta, 2016;Fontagné et al, 2015;Grundke and Moser, 2019;Kruse et al, 2021). A key message from this literature is that, as NTMs have progressively replaced tariffs as a determinant of trade costs, an analysis focused on these measures is needed to precisely assess the impact of trade policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%