2007
DOI: 10.1080/08957340709336730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standards-to-Standards Linkage Under Title III: Exploring Common Language Demands in ELD and Science Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this initial characterization of AE, Bailey and colleagues further operationalized the AE construct through an empirical approach that examined multiple sources of AE use in mainstream, upper-elementary classes Bailey, Butler, & Sato, 2007;Butler et al, 2004). The goal was to begin to articulate the AE target that students (native speakers and ELLs) must achieve to function well in content classes, which could serve as a baseline for the development of English language proficiency (ELP) standards and curricula materials.…”
Section: How the Literature Explicates Features Within And Across Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this initial characterization of AE, Bailey and colleagues further operationalized the AE construct through an empirical approach that examined multiple sources of AE use in mainstream, upper-elementary classes Bailey, Butler, & Sato, 2007;Butler et al, 2004). The goal was to begin to articulate the AE target that students (native speakers and ELLs) must achieve to function well in content classes, which could serve as a baseline for the development of English language proficiency (ELP) standards and curricula materials.…”
Section: How the Literature Explicates Features Within And Across Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Abedi and Hejri (2004) found that the performance gap between ELLs and non-ELLs was larger on linguistically complex items than on noncomplex items, regardless of the item content difficulty. An important distinction to be made is between everyday language and academic language: the contextual application of language, such as the use of nonspecialized academic words and specialized content area words (e.g., Bailey & Butler, 2003;Bailey, Butler, & Sato, 2007). Recently, two Dutch studies investigated this issue in secondary education mathematics.…”
Section: The Language Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(CCSSO, 2009c) One of the features added to the SEC process to help address the above questions is the analysis and coding of the language demands and language complexity across content standards, assessments, and instruction (Sato, Smithson, Usma, & Worth, 2008). The notion of language demands refers to the language necessary for achievement in the content areas (Bailey, Butler, & Sato, 2007). Examples of categories of language demands include identification, labeling, enumeration, classification, inquiring, description, analyzing, negotiation, and evaluation.…”
Section: Sec and Ellsmentioning
confidence: 99%