2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standing balance of children with developmental coordination disorder under altered sensory conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
51
2
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
51
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the three sensorial pathways used by children, the vestibular system seems to be the least effective for postural control purposes 16 . These findings are consistent with the results of Cherng et al 17 , who compared young adults aged 19-23 years with children aged 7-10 years using a balance assessment tool called Equitest. According to the authors, the functional efficiency of the vestibular system is still developing in 10-year-old children 17 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the three sensorial pathways used by children, the vestibular system seems to be the least effective for postural control purposes 16 . These findings are consistent with the results of Cherng et al 17 , who compared young adults aged 19-23 years with children aged 7-10 years using a balance assessment tool called Equitest. According to the authors, the functional efficiency of the vestibular system is still developing in 10-year-old children 17 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These findings are consistent with the results of Cherng et al 17 , who compared young adults aged 19-23 years with children aged 7-10 years using a balance assessment tool called Equitest. According to the authors, the functional efficiency of the vestibular system is still developing in 10-year-old children 17 . In the study by Tsai et al, 18 children with delayed coordination development showed statistically significant body sways, greater than in children considered normal, for almost all conditions mentioned by the authors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, the study reported greater differences under dual or more challenging walking conditions. Also, the current research shows that there were significant differences between groups in time and percentage in the stance phase (s) in which the time that TD spent on stance phase was longer than in the LMC children, supporting the idea that LMC children have balance problems (Cherng et al, 2007;Geuze 2003;Tsai et al, 2008) and similarly they spend more time in those parameters that were related to double support (Cermak and Larkin 2002;Deconinck et al, 2006b;Sudgen and Chambers 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The emerging results were mixed. Some studies showed pronounced differences between the groups in static balance (e.g., quiet standing task) [20,21], others revealed differences only on few but not all measures [22], or those were manifested only when the task demands were enhanced [23]. At this point, the underlying motor control limiters associated with these problems are still not well understood, and they may result from many different perceptual-motor, and as hypothesized here, attentional issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%