2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.71.127503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star formation rate density and the stochastic background of gravitational waves

Abstract: There is in the literature a number of papers addressing the stochastic background of gravitational waves (GWs) generated by an ensemble of astrophysical sources. The main ingredient in such studies is the so called star formation rate density (SFRD), which gives the density of stars formed per unit time. Some authors argue, however, that there is, in the equation that determines the amplitude of the stochastic background of GWs, an additional (1 + z) term dividing the SFRD, which would account for the effect … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correcting for this effect is not always straightforward. Thus, there are large uncertainties associated to the determination of the CSFR as can be seen from Figs 1–3 (see, in particular, Hopkins 2004; de Araujo & Miranda 2005 who discuss these uncertainties with more details).…”
Section: The Cosmic Star Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correcting for this effect is not always straightforward. Thus, there are large uncertainties associated to the determination of the CSFR as can be seen from Figs 1–3 (see, in particular, Hopkins 2004; de Araujo & Miranda 2005 who discuss these uncertainties with more details).…”
Section: The Cosmic Star Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we use the CSFR obtained from the hierarchical model to determine the stochastic background of gravitational waves (SBGWs) generated by stars which collapse to black holes. Initially, we present a quick overview on the formalism used to characterize a SBGWs because this subject is discussed in previous works (see, for example, de Araujo et al 2000, 2002, 2004; Miranda, de Araujo & Aguiar 2004; de Araujo & Miranda 2005). After this quick overview we display and compare the results of the models considered.…”
Section: The Stochastic Background Of Gravitational Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factor (1 + z) in equation (4) converts R(z) to an earth time based quantity. The statement that such a factor does not exist given in de Araujo & Miranda (2005) does not change the calculation of ΩGW(f ) as the factor appears additionally in their equation for dE/dSdf . This caveat has also appeared in other publications, e.g., Regimbau & Mandic (2008); Zhu et al (2010Zhu et al ( , 2011a; Howell et al (2011).…”
Section: Properties Of An Agwbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From (1), (7) and (29), one notices that √ S h ∝ ρ * (z 0 ) and √ S h ∝ √ λ nsns . Therefore, if ones multiplyρ * (z 0 ) or λ nsns by, say, a factor of 10, the amplitudes shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…where α = 3/5, β = 14/15, z m = 5.4 and with ρ m = 0.15M ⊙ yr −1 Mpc −3 fixing the normalization. Besides, in (7), λ nsns = β ns f p Φ ns (see [1]) is the mass fraction of stars that is converted into neutron stars, where β ns is the fraction of binaries that survive to the second supernova event; f p gives the fraction of massive binaries (that is, those systems where both components can generate supernovae) and Φ ns is the mass fraction of progenitors that originates neutron stars, which, in the present case, is calculated by…”
Section: Calculation Of Dr/dvmentioning
confidence: 98%