2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/701/2/1398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star Formation Rates for Starburst Galaxies From Ultraviolet, Infrared, and Radio Luminosities

Abstract: We present a comparison of star formation rates (SFR) determined from mid-infrared 7.7 µm PAH luminosity [SFR(PAH)], from 1.4 GHz radio luminosity [SFR(radio)], and from far ultraviolet luminosity [SFR(UV)] for a sample of 287 starburst galaxies with z < 0.5 having Spitzer IRS observations. The previously adopted relation log [SFR(PAH)] = log [νL ν (7.7 µm)] -42.57±0.2, for SFR in M ⊙ yr −1 and νL ν (7.7 µm) the luminosity at the peak of the 7.7 µm PAH feature in ergs s −1 , is found to agree with SFR(radio). … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…After converting these fluxes into luminosities, we estimated the SFR using the relation obtained by Sargsyan & Weedman (2009): log SFR PAH = log λL SB λ (7.7 µm) − 42.57 ± 0.2,…”
Section: Star Formation Rate From Pah Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After converting these fluxes into luminosities, we estimated the SFR using the relation obtained by Sargsyan & Weedman (2009): log SFR PAH = log λL SB λ (7.7 µm) − 42.57 ± 0.2,…”
Section: Star Formation Rate From Pah Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) is calibrated with respect to the total 7.7 µm flux, including both components. In any case, the continuum contribution is typically just ∼10% of the total (Sargsyan & Weedman 2009). Since α 6 is close to unity in all our sources, the relative error of the SB contribution at 6 µm is high.…”
Section: Star Formation Rate From Pah Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method yields considerably smaller EW values as it assigns a nonnegligible fraction of the PAH flux extracted by PAHFIT to the continuum. Figure 12 shows our EWs (Equation (3)) against the 6.2 μm PAH EWs computed by Sargsyan & Weedman (2009) for the SSGSS sample assuming a single Gaussian on a linear continuum between 5.5 μm and 6.9 μm. Their published sample is restricted to SF galaxies defined as having EW(6.2 μm) > 0.4 μm (Weedman & Houck 2009).…”
Section: Pah Equivalent Widthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in [23] the comparison of Star Formation Rates (SFR) measured in the infrared and ultraviolet can be used to derive an empirical estimate of extinction for the ultraviolet luminosity. For this purpose in [23], a sample of 287 SB galaxies with z < 0.5 was used having Spitzer IRS observations.…”
Section: The Calibration Of Star Formation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose in [23], a sample of 287 SB galaxies with z < 0.5 was used having Spitzer IRS observations. As an infrared flux the mid-infrared 7.7 m μ polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) luminosity [SFR(PAH)] was used.…”
Section: The Calibration Of Star Formation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%