2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Star formation suppression and bar ages in nearby barred galaxies

Abstract: We present new spectroscopic data for 21 barred spiral galaxies, which we use to explore the effect of bars on disk star formation, and to place constraints on the characteristic lifetimes of bar episodes. The analysis centres on regions of heavily suppressed star formation activity, which we term 'star formation deserts'. Long-slit optical spectroscopy is used to determine Hβ absorption strengths in these desert regions, and comparisons with theoretical stellar population models are used to determine the time… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If there were no radial migration of young stars from the disk to the SFD, then the age distribution of SFD stars would show a truncation within ∼ 1 Gyr after the time of bar formation. However, this is not the case, and the SFD age distributions show a gradual downturn instead of a truncation, which makes recovering the epoch of bar formation more complicated than James & Percival (2016, 2018 anticipated. The different shapes of age distributions for SFD and bar stars can provide an indication of when the bar formed, but the signal is weak and potentially hard to detect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If there were no radial migration of young stars from the disk to the SFD, then the age distribution of SFD stars would show a truncation within ∼ 1 Gyr after the time of bar formation. However, this is not the case, and the SFD age distributions show a gradual downturn instead of a truncation, which makes recovering the epoch of bar formation more complicated than James & Percival (2016, 2018 anticipated. The different shapes of age distributions for SFD and bar stars can provide an indication of when the bar formed, but the signal is weak and potentially hard to detect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method we propose to date bar formation in a galaxy relies on a very weak signal, which makes applying the SFD bar dating method more complex than previously suggested in James & Percival (2016, 2018. Indeed, the method we propose relies on the accurate recovery of SFH shapes for the bar and SFD.…”
Section: Application To Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The likelihood for disk galaxies hosting stellar bar is found to be anti-correlated with specific star formation rate regardless of stellar mass and the prominence of the bulge (Cheung et al 2013). The presence of stellar bars can quench star formation in the central regions of galaxy by suppressing the star formation along the co-rotation radius of the bar (James & Percival 2018). The shock and shear generated within the galaxy due to the presence of a bar can create turbulence preventing the molecular gas from collapse thereby inhibiting star formation (Reynaud & Downes 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Here we attempt to understand the significance of bar quenching in the global quenching of star formation of barred galaxies. The length of the stellar bar, a proxy for the strength of the bar (Elmegreen et al 2007;Guo et al 2019), is expected to enhance the impact of bar quenching in the galaxy (Spinoso et al 2017;James & Percival 2018). This is possible since star formation suppression happens over the region covered by the bar length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%