State Mental Health Systems for Children: A Review of the Literature and Available Data Sources

McMorrow, Stacey

doi:10.1037/e690302011-001

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 62 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Gangguan kesehatan mental pada remaja adalah hal yang umum, telah di teliti bahwa satu dari lima remaja memiliki gangguan kesehatan mental yang sudah di diagnosis (Schwarz, 2009). Remaja laki-laki umumnya lebih banyak memiliki diagnose gangguan perlaku seperti ADHD, dan autism spectrum disorders (McMorrow & Howell, 2010), sedangkan, remaja perempuan lebih umum memiliki diagnosa depression and eating disorders dibanding laki-laki (Rosen, 2010). Orang yang memiliki gangguan kesehatan mental dipandang buruk oleh masyarakat yaitu disebut stigma buruk masyarakat.…”

unclassified

Stigma related to Asking for Help from a Mental Health Professional in Bandung, Indonesia

Biladina

2021

JHeS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sejumlah remaja di Bandung, mengeluh memiliki ciri-ciri gangguan kesehatan mental tetapi, mereka tidak ingin mengungkapkan situasi tersebut kepada profesional kesehatan mental karena takut stigma masyarakat. Penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif menggunakan metode wawancara dengan rumusan masalah sebagai berikut (1) Apakah seorang individu akan mencari pertolongan dari profesional kesehatan mental jika merasa memiliki gangguan kesehatan mental. (2) Apa stigma yang dikatakan jika mereka mencari bantuan profesional kesehatan mental. Subjek penelitian ini terdiri dari 25 informan , usia 18 hingga 24 tahun. Ada 25 informan yang mengatakan bahwa mereka ada keinginan untuk mencari profesional kesehatan mental tapi mereka takut melakukannya karena stigma.

show abstract

unclassified

Stigma related to Asking for Help from a Mental Health Professional in Bandung, Indonesia

Biladina

2021

JHeS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Relevant, too, are the challenges of using first-person reports from children and parents, along with "objective" data from professionals, and of accounting for cultural differences of expectation and assessment. Substantial as these challenges are, however, they have been addressed (11,12), even in the global context (13).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward Evaluation in Public Services: Getting Past the Barriers

Harper

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of public programs in mental health and in other fields is often blocked when "reasons not to" are cited. These include "HIPAA," "IRB," "not my job," "it's already evidence based," "we know what's right," "we don't know enough," "we don't have baseline data," and "there's too much to do." Examining these reasons, the values thought to justify them, and possible ways to respond will facilitate evaluation research.

show abstract

“…Mental health researchers, practitioners, and policymakers agree there is a need for improvement in community mental health services for youth (Garland et al, 2013; McMorrow & Howell, 2010; Warren et al, 2010). Studies of community mental health service systems confirm that they vary in effectiveness and that we know little about why some systems are more effective than others or how the effectiveness of community mental health services can be improved (National Institute of Mental Health [ NIMH], 2015).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Aligning organizational priorities with ARC to improve youth mental health service outcomes.

Glisson¹,

Williams²,

Hemmelgarn³

et al. 2016

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The ARC organizational intervention was designed to improve community-based youth mental health services by aligning organizational priorities with five principles of effective service organizations (i.e., mission-driven, results-oriented, improvement-directed, relationship-centered, participation-based). This study assessed the effect of the ARC intervention on youth outcomes and the mediating role of organizational priorities as a mechanism linking the ARC intervention to outcomes. Methodology Fourteen community-based mental health agencies in a Midwestern metropolis along with 475 clinicians and 605 youth (aged 5–18) served by those agencies were randomly assigned to the three-year ARC intervention or control condition. The agencies’ priorities were measured with the ARC Principles Questionnaire (APQ) completed by clinicians at the end of the intervention. Youth outcomes were measured as total problems in psychosocial functioning described by their caregivers using the Shortform Assessment for Children (SAC) at six monthly intervals. Results The rate of improvement in youths’ psychosocial functioning in agencies assigned to the ARC condition was 1.6 times the rate of improvement in agencies assigned to the control condition, creating a standardized difference in functioning of d = .23 between the two groups at the six month follow-up. The effect on youth outcomes was fully mediated by the alignment of organizational priorities described in the five ARC principles (d = .21). Conclusions The ARC organizational intervention improves youth outcomes by aligning organizational priorities with the five ARC principles. The findings suggest that organizational priorities explain why some community mental health agencies are more effective than others.

show abstract

State Mental Health Systems for Children: A Review of the Literature and Available Data Sources

Cited by 5 publications

References 62 publications

Stigma related to Asking for Help from a Mental Health Professional in Bandung, Indonesia

Stigma related to Asking for Help from a Mental Health Professional in Bandung, Indonesia

Toward Evaluation in Public Services: Getting Past the Barriers

Aligning organizational priorities with ARC to improve youth mental health service outcomes.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About