2022
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2022.3208898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-of-the-Art: AI-Assisted Surrogate Modeling and Optimization for Microwave Filters

Abstract: Microwave filters are indispensable passive devices for modern wireless communication systems. Nowadays, electromagnetic (EM) simulation-based design process is a norm for filter designs. Many EM-based design methodologies for microwave filter design have emerged in recent years to achieve efficiency, automation, and customizability. The majority of EM-based design methods exploit low-cost models (i.e., surrogates) in various forms and artificial intelligence techniques assist the surrogate modeling and optimi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now with Reykjavik University, Iceland, he is surely the most identifiable researcher in our community with respect to all aspects of surrogate methodologies and their applications. Koziel and his team spearheaded innovative electromagnetic simulation-driven and surrogate-based optimization procedures for microwave circuits and antenna design, including variable-fidelity optimization frameworks [209], [210], [211]; surrogate-assisted tuning [191], [212], [213], yield estimation [214], [215], and multi-objective optimization [216], [217], [218], [219], [220]; methodologies for rapid re-design by inverse surrogates [221], [222]; microwave component miniaturization [223], [224]; dimensionally reduced and domain confined surrogates [225], [226], [227]; response feature-based nominal design [228], [229], [230], [231], [232], yield optimization [233], [234], [235], [236], [237], and robust design by tolerance maximization [238], [239], [240].…”
Section: Surrogate Methodologies and Bayesian Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now with Reykjavik University, Iceland, he is surely the most identifiable researcher in our community with respect to all aspects of surrogate methodologies and their applications. Koziel and his team spearheaded innovative electromagnetic simulation-driven and surrogate-based optimization procedures for microwave circuits and antenna design, including variable-fidelity optimization frameworks [209], [210], [211]; surrogate-assisted tuning [191], [212], [213], yield estimation [214], [215], and multi-objective optimization [216], [217], [218], [219], [220]; methodologies for rapid re-design by inverse surrogates [221], [222]; microwave component miniaturization [223], [224]; dimensionally reduced and domain confined surrogates [225], [226], [227]; response feature-based nominal design [228], [229], [230], [231], [232], yield optimization [233], [234], [235], [236], [237], and robust design by tolerance maximization [238], [239], [240].…”
Section: Surrogate Methodologies and Bayesian Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively large surrogate modeling space may work for some EM devices (e.g., antennas [20], [21]), but not for filters. As said above, filter responses often degrade significantly even when a small deviation is added to an optimal design [22]. Therefore, a slightly large surrogate modeling space may cause the MC samples satisfying the design requirements to become very few (e.g., < 1% of the MC samples according to our pilot experiments), leading to insufficient information for surrogate modeling of the design subspaces meeting the requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%