State of the Science Conference in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 2011: introduction

Boninger, Michael L.; Brienza, David M.; Charlifue, Susan; Chen, Y. Y.; Curley, Kenneth C.; Graves, Daniel E.; Groah, Suzanne L.; Heinemann, Allen W.; Hudson, Lesley M.; Jackson, Amie B.; Johnson, Kurt; Kalpakjian, Claire Z.; Kusiak, Audrey; Larson, Katherine E.; Agustin, Teti; Sherwood, Arthur M.; Shinowara, N.; Stripling, T; Tate, Denise G.

doi:10.1038/sc.2012.13

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the disabling consequences of incurring a SCI can be severe and once significantly reduced life expectancy, individuals with SCI can now expect to live almost as long as those without SCI, depending on their degree of neurological impairment (Middleton et al, 2012). With improved outcome expectations after a SCI, research has shifted to issues associated with long-term survival, such as examining support needed to facilitate community reintegration, and improving participation and quality of life (Boninger et al, 2012; Heinemann, Steeves, Boninger, Groah, & Sherwood, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transformational mentoring: Leadership behaviors of spinal cord injury peer mentors.

Shaw

McBride

Casemore

et al. 2018

Rehabilitation Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transformational mentoring: Leadership behaviors of spinal cord injury peer mentors.

Shaw

McBride

Casemore

et al. 2018

Rehabilitation Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part II: Background to a research strategy

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part III: outcomes

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study design: Focus Group. Objectives: To develop a unified, regional spinal cord injury (SCI) research strategy for Australia and New Zealand. Setting: Australia. Methods: A 1-day structured stakeholder dialogue was convened in 2013 in Melbourne, Australia, by the National Trauma Research Institute in collaboration with the SCI Network of Australia and New Zealand. Twenty-three experts participated, representing local and international research, clinical, consumer, advocacy, government policy and funding perspectives. Preparatory work synthesised evidence and articulated draft principles and options as a starting point for discussion. Results: A regional SCI research strategy was proposed, whose objectives can be summarised under four themes. (1) Collaborative networks and strategic partnerships to increase efficiency, reduce duplication, build capacity and optimise research funding. (2) Research priority setting and coordination to manage competing studies. (3) Mechanisms for greater consumer engagement in research. (4) Resources and infrastructure to further develop SCI data registries, evaluate research translation and assess alignment of research strategy with stakeholder interests. These are consistent with contemporary international SCI research strategy development activities. Conclusion: This first step in a regional SCI research strategy has articulated objectives for further development by the wider SCI research community. The initiative has also reinforced the importance of coordinated, collective action in optimising outcomes following SCI.

show abstract

State of the Science Conference in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 2011: introduction

Cited by 4 publications

References 2 publications

Transformational mentoring: Leadership behaviors of spinal cord injury peer mentors.

Transformational mentoring: Leadership behaviors of spinal cord injury peer mentors.

Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part II: Background to a research strategy

Developing a spinal cord injury research strategy using a structured process of evidence review and stakeholder dialogue. Part III: outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About