2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State or trait? Measuring resilience by generalisability theory in breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In my study, we concluded that resilience was acted as not only a stable state-like positive psychological capability, which could be changed and improved, but also as a personality trait. This was in agreement with the recent study of measuring resilience by generalizability theory in breast cancer (34). Thus, counseling and psychotherapy initiatives such as stress management and resilience-enhancement training should be provided for women to reduce the negative effects of pregnancy on the prevalence of prenatal depression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In my study, we concluded that resilience was acted as not only a stable state-like positive psychological capability, which could be changed and improved, but also as a personality trait. This was in agreement with the recent study of measuring resilience by generalizability theory in breast cancer (34). Thus, counseling and psychotherapy initiatives such as stress management and resilience-enhancement training should be provided for women to reduce the negative effects of pregnancy on the prevalence of prenatal depression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Whether it should be considered a temporary state of mind, meaning it can change according to the situation, or a trait, meaning it is a stable characteristic of a person, has been under debate. 28 Viewing resilience as a personality trait has been very influential; however, it is limited by the denial of the complexities of psychological principles. 29 In this regard, Richardson's metatheory of resilience and resiliency defined resilience as having both trait and contextual factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a five‐point Likert scale (1 = never, 2 = seldom, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, and 5 = always), with higher scores indicating higher levels of resilience (range from 25 to 125). RS‐SC has been validated by Classic Test Theory, Item Response Theory, and Generalisability Theory 16–18 . The Cronbach α of RS‐SC was 0.83 in the previous studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%