State-Public Management of Vocational and Pedagogical Education in the Region

Abstract

The relevance of the study is due to the positioning of teacher education as a state-public system. The purpose of the article is to develop a mechanism of state-public management of vocational and pedagogical education in the region. The methodological basis of the study was a set of principles of systematization, concretization, participativeness, allowing to establish relationships between the subjects of management. The main results of the research consist in substantiating the social partnership of organizers of pedagogical education; the creation of public institutions for the management of the quality of teacher education; integration of the subjects of management. The study involved 38 heads of educational organizations, 150 teachers, 430 students, who identified the criteria for assessing state-public management (rational, social). The significance of the results obtained is that social partnership ensures the organization of an educational consortium. The creation of public institutions for the management of the quality of education provides a public discussion of the evaluation criteria and transparency of the control procedure. The integration of the subjects of management provides networking for various logical reasons. The revealed criteria contribute to the conjugation of professional and educational standards (rational), the improvement of the system of continuous pedagogical education on the basis of consolidation and variable interaction of its subjects (social). In the course of the experiment, state-public structures of education management were created.

Psychological and Pedagogical Support of the Formation of Professional World Outlook of the University Students

“…3) creation of favorable psychological and pedagogical conditions for the successful development of young people, ensuring personal development, social and professional selfformation and self-realization, preservation of psychological health of participants of educational process representing the state of subjective well-being of the individual, providing optimal opportunities for effective interaction with the surrounding world, people and will be able to implement internal resources (Ivanov et al, 2016;Terentyeva, Starodubtsev et al, 2016;Zamaletdinov et al, 2016); 4) the system of professional activity of the teacher, aimed at the creation of psychopedagogical conditions for the successful training, education and professional and personal development of the student (Krylov et al, 2016;Terentyeva et al, 2016). The main objective of psycho-pedagogical support -maximum support personal and professional development of students.…”

Untitled

“…The world health organization in its publications widely uses the concept of "social determinants of health", understanding under them the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and become old (World Health Organization, 2017). These circumstances are influenced by the distribution of money, power and resources at global, national and local level, which, in turn, impact policies (Ivanov et al, 2016;Terentyeva, Mukhomorova et al, 2016). Social determinants of health are a major cause of inequities in healththe unfair and avoidable differences in health status seen within and between countries.…”

“…Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods ISSN: 2251-6204 integrity of the individual, reproducing itself in space and time as semideterminate, self-replicating, selfdetermined entity, and representing the intrinsic value and substantiality in all spheres of life (Ramaekers, 2005;Terentyeva, Starodubtsev et al, 2016); 2) the essence of man as a socio-natural component of concrete historical existence (Ivanov et al, 2016;Porter & Vidovich, 2000); 3) the essence of man as a dialectical unity of activity and social relations (Pollack, 2007;Terentyeva, Mukhomorova et al, 2016 ); 4) the totality of socially significant features and mental characteristics, established during ontogenesis and determine the social being (Lunev, Safin et al, 2016;Nissilä et al, 2015). The efficiency of formation of common cultural competences provides that we review their carrier (the identity of the student) as a public individual, the subject of cognition and the objective transformation of the world, possessing a set of stable socially significant qualities and mental properties.…”