State spending for higher education: Does it improve economic performance?

Abstract

Abstract. Increases in regional spending for higher education are conventionally believed to cause increases in economic performance. However, while some empirical evidence directly or indirectly confirms this belief, some research also brings it into question and even contradicts it. This research uses panel Granger causal models to consider not only the conventional belief but also the opposite possibility -that increases in economic performance cause increases in US state spending for higher education. It examines state spending for higher education in relation to educational attainment, per capita income and gross domestic product within the fifty states of the United States for the period 1989-2014. The results show that while increases in the share of a state's population with a bachelor degree Granger causes improved economic performance, in the short term of four years or less the direction of causality goes in the opposite direction from the one conventionally believed. Implications of this reverse causality are discussed from the policy perspective. JEL classification: O

The augmented and integrative model of economic growth: Theoretical and empirical evidence from USA

“…The results indicate that investment in human and non-human capital is responsible for an overwhelming proportion of American economic growth in the period studied (Jorgenson and Fraumeni, 1992). (Bowen and Qian, 2017) expanded the investigative range of human capital in the U.S. when they set out to study the impact of investment in higher education in the U.S. states. The results indicated that state spending on higher education does not promote an increase in economic activity, but an improvement in economic performance causes spending on higher education to increase, so it is concluded that higher education is a normal good (Bowen and Qian, 2017).…”

Public Policy Analysis On Education Budget Allocation: Case Studys in Regencies/Municipalities East Java, Indonesia

“…It could happen because many other policy domains are outside of education, such as law enforcement, environmental infrastructure development, and others (Flink and Luis, 2016). In addition, the New York Times also reported that the limited government support for education was caused by the increased business competition and economic development policies found in several Municipalities and states in the United (Bowen and Qian 2017). Similarly, the State of Canada also revealed that the increase in the number of student enrollments in the country is inversely proportional to the allocation of education budget policies which have shrunk from 84% to 57% in the last few decades.…”

Impact of transport infrastructure on local development in Dalmatia

“…Some research (Goetz & Rupasingha, 2003) shows that investing in higher education induces the brain drain effect. An important distinction between investing in higher education and the quality of human capital was provided by Bowen and Qian (2017). The authors found a relation in which economic growth precedes investment in higher education.…”