2014
DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2014.945410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-Supported Science and Imaginary Lock-in: The Case of Regenerative Medicine in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We might ask, however, whether there is a different dynamic of inequity to be aware of in the evolving terrain of international regulatory differences, in terms of the politics of science and the flows of power within global scientific discourse. The importance of stem cell science and regenerative medicine to the national agenda in Japan [ 63 ] creates pressure toward policies intended to promote rapid advance in this field, in order to gain ground in the arena of global science and the biotechnology market. This drive must be understood in the context of an international scientific competition that has been heavily dominated by certain few and powerful countries, with adverse scientific, political and economic consequences for those countries that lag behind: the push toward expanded provision is a way for Japan itself to keep pace.…”
Section: Tapping the Multinational Research Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We might ask, however, whether there is a different dynamic of inequity to be aware of in the evolving terrain of international regulatory differences, in terms of the politics of science and the flows of power within global scientific discourse. The importance of stem cell science and regenerative medicine to the national agenda in Japan [ 63 ] creates pressure toward policies intended to promote rapid advance in this field, in order to gain ground in the arena of global science and the biotechnology market. This drive must be understood in the context of an international scientific competition that has been heavily dominated by certain few and powerful countries, with adverse scientific, political and economic consequences for those countries that lag behind: the push toward expanded provision is a way for Japan itself to keep pace.…”
Section: Tapping the Multinational Research Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no consensus on whether ESCs and IPSCs can be treated interchangeably or on the therapeutic usefulness of IPSCs, which is yet to be confirmed. In many cases, IPSCs are used as tools for basic research or modeling diseases in a laboratory, rather than as sources for regenerative medicine (Anastacia et al, 2010; Mikami, 2015). The appearance of IPSCs has also raised questionings on the future of embryonic stem cell research Minger, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to science and ethics, a lack of ethical and political debate about stem cells, such as embryonic stem (ES) cells and iPS cells, led Japanese people, including scientists, journalists and politicians, to uncritically accept the discovery of STAP cells. As social scientists had already pointed out, without sufficient debate about uncertainty and safety of reprogramed cells or the donation and use of somatic cells Japanese policy jumped to the promotion of iPS cell research and medical applications (SleeboomFaulkner, 2008(SleeboomFaulkner, , 2011Mikami, 2014). The new book Good Science: The Ethical Choreography of Stem Cell Research by Charis Thompson provides various insights into how to rethink the relationship between stem cell science and ethics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%