2010
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and Cyclic Out-of-Plane Response of Masonry Walls Strengthened Using Textile-Mortar System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…cement-based mortars) for strengthening reinforced concrete structures has been reported less than a decade ago by , and Bournas et al (2007); and more recently by D'Ambrisi and Focacci (2011), Al-Salloum et al (2011, 2012 and Loreto et al (2014). Tests on masonry sub-assemblies and wallettes have provided experimental evidence that TRM is effective in strengthening masonry structures too, as it enhances both the in-plane and out-of-plane strength , Papanicolaou et al 2008, Harajli et al 2010, Augenti et al 2011, Papanicolaou et al 2011, Babaeidarabad et al 2013, as well as the strength in diagonal compression (Prota et al 2006, Babaeidarabad et al 2014. Nonetheless, in all these studies individual, single storey wall-type masonry specimens were employed, without considering the frame-wall interaction in multistorey structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cement-based mortars) for strengthening reinforced concrete structures has been reported less than a decade ago by , and Bournas et al (2007); and more recently by D'Ambrisi and Focacci (2011), Al-Salloum et al (2011, 2012 and Loreto et al (2014). Tests on masonry sub-assemblies and wallettes have provided experimental evidence that TRM is effective in strengthening masonry structures too, as it enhances both the in-plane and out-of-plane strength , Papanicolaou et al 2008, Harajli et al 2010, Augenti et al 2011, Papanicolaou et al 2011, Babaeidarabad et al 2013, as well as the strength in diagonal compression (Prota et al 2006, Babaeidarabad et al 2014. Nonetheless, in all these studies individual, single storey wall-type masonry specimens were employed, without considering the frame-wall interaction in multistorey structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique has a few drawbacks which are attributed to the resins used to bind or impregnate the fibers. These drawbacks include poor behavior of epoxy resins at high temperatures; the requirement of special and expensive fire protection measures; the relatively high cost of epoxies; a lack of vapor permeability, which may cause damage to the concrete or masonry structure, and the incompatibility of epoxy resins and substrate materials (Harajli et al 2010;Kolsch 1998;Papanicolaou et al 2011;Pinho et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wall systems exhibited a considerable increase in the out-of-plane bending capacity compared with the unstrengthened walls. Harajli et al (2010) investigated URM walls strengthened with textile reinforced mortar. Specimens (N = 25) were constructed of different stones-hollow block, brick, and sandstone-bonded by a mortar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such composites are typically made of a composite grid (made of synthetic fibers such as glass, carbon or PBO, or of natural fibers such as flax or hemp) immersed in an inorganic mortar (based on cement, lime or geopolymer material), making their mechanical behavior different from conventional FRPs [1][2][3][4]. The choice of the matrix and reinforcing material along with the determination of total thickness of the composite system mostly depends on the type of substrate and mechanical contribution requested from the intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…application of eccentric compressive load [10][11]; 2. application of airbag loading [12]; 3. three or four points bending [13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%