2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2017.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static response of double shell concrete lining with a spray-applied waterproofing membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the beam tested without axial force, although the longitudinal strains and midspan deflections did not match theoretical values derived for a fully-composite beam, the authors nevertheless concluded that the beams were indeed fully composite and that instead there was a problem with the strain measurement. In fact, composite SCL beams are only partially composite structurally [18,58] and are expected to exhibit larger deflections under the same loading and a different distribution of strain in the cross-section [18] compared to pure sprayed concrete or 'fully composite' beams.…”
Section: Wet Dry Partially Saturated)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the beam tested without axial force, although the longitudinal strains and midspan deflections did not match theoretical values derived for a fully-composite beam, the authors nevertheless concluded that the beams were indeed fully composite and that instead there was a problem with the strain measurement. In fact, composite SCL beams are only partially composite structurally [18,58] and are expected to exhibit larger deflections under the same loading and a different distribution of strain in the cross-section [18] compared to pure sprayed concrete or 'fully composite' beams.…”
Section: Wet Dry Partially Saturated)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrophobicity of cement-based materials is predominantly improved by surface hydrophobic modification and internal hydrophobic modification [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Generally, surface hydrophobic modification involves the surface treatment of cement-based materials, such as coating, dipping and spraying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, a hydrophobic release agent with SiO 2 -CH 3 submicron-sized particles has been developed [ 12 ]; this agent increases the apparent contact angle of the cement mortar surface to higher than 145°, which can improve the hydrophobicity of cement mortar without reducing its compressive strength. Super-hydrophobic concrete has been developed by spraying ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer to improve its structural property [ 16 ]. A silica-based hybrid nanocomposite, SiO 2 /polymethylhydrosiloxane (SiO 2 /PMHS), has been used for the surface treatment of cement-based materials, which can reduce their water absorption and air permeability [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that water is one of the most aggressive external atmospheric agent that penetrates into mortar structure causing an important physical and chemical degradation that compromises its functionality [4][5][6][7]. In this way, materials such as superplasticizers [8], hydrophobic organic-inorganic materials and membranes based on EVA-copolymer [9] have been used to increase the mortar waterproofness and to enhance the infrastructure service life [10,11]. These materials have been applied by different procedures: impregnation, immersion, additives and release agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%