2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-011-4820-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static SPME sampling of VOCs emitted from indoor building materials: prediction of calibration curves of single compounds for two different emission cells

Abstract: Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a powerful technique, easy to implement for on-site static sampling of indoor VOCs emitted by building materials. However, a major constraint lies in the establishment of calibration curves which requires complex generation of standard atmospheres. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to propose a model to predict adsorption kinetics (i.e., calibration curves) of four model VOCs. The model is based on Fick's laws for the gas phase and on the equilibrium or the solid diffusio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tortuosity model was chosen in the software to calculate the effective diffusivity. Tortuosity factor (σ) was calculated from the corresponding porosity [7]:…”
Section: Visual Representation Of the Geometries Is Provided In Fig mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tortuosity model was chosen in the software to calculate the effective diffusivity. Tortuosity factor (σ) was calculated from the corresponding porosity [7]:…”
Section: Visual Representation Of the Geometries Is Provided In Fig mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important resources for optimization of SPME-based methods is the theory of the method, which is well established [5][6][7][8][9][10] yet underutilized. The theory is often used by method developers only as a tool to explain the results of the experimental optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where: r is the average pore radius (0.6 nm); T is the temperature (298 K); M is the molecular mass (78•10 -3 kg mol -1 ). Net diffusion coefficient in pores (DP = 1.14•10 -7 m 2 s -1 ) was calculated using [5,19]:…”
Section: Modeling Of the Effect Of Benzene Diffusion Coefficient In Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important resources for optimization of SPME-based methods is the theory of the method, which is well established [3][4][5][6][7][8] yet underutilized. The theory is often used by method developers only as a tool to explain the results of the experimental optimization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isotropic diffusion coefficient (in the air inside pores) was the same as for air (set to 8.8, 8.7, 12.4 and 10.1 mm 2 s -1 for benzene, toluene, acetone, and dichloromethane, respectively). The approach proposed by Mocho and Desauziers [31] involving Knudsen diffusion in micro-pores was also tested. However, it…”
Section: Sampling Using Adsorptive Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%