Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media

Abstract

Science communication has been increasingly viewed as a necessity and obligation of scientists in recent years. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies, such as social media, has made communication of science to the public more accessible as a whole. While one of the primary goals of science communication is to increase public engagement, there is very little research to show the type of communication that fosters the highest levels of engagement. Here we evaluate two social medial platforms, Instagram and TikTok, and assess the type of educational science content (ESC) that promotes user awareness and overall engagement. Specifically, we measured the level of engagement between static and dynamic posts on Instagram, and lecture-style and experimental videos on TikTok. User engagement is measured through the analysis of relative number of likes, comments, shares, saves, and views of each post in the various categories. We found that users interact with ESC significantly more (p<0.05) when the content is presented in dynamic ways with a component of experimentation. Together, we took the findings of this study and provided a series of suggestions for conducting science communication on social media, and the type of ESC that should be used to promote better user outcomes.

How Do Dieticians on Instagram Teach? The Potential of the Kirkpatrick Model in the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Nutritional Education in Social Media

“…Due to the strong emphasis on trying to change eating behavior as early as possible in life [18], this study focused on Instagram, which users are most commonly the younger generation members (18-34 years) [19].…”

#outubrorosa e promoção da saúde: análise das postagens no Instagram sobre o câncer de mama

“…Entende-se que imagens como fotos, pictogramas e infográficos são importantes ferramentas para manutenção da identidade da conta e relação do seguidor com o conteúdo postado, visto que possuem potencial de impactar as atitudes e percepções acerca do que o instagramer pretende influenciar (BARROS et al, 2014;HOUTS et al, 2006). Além disso, no caso específico do câncer de mama, tem sido mostrado que informações da internet podem ser difíceis de serem lidas e interpretadas, e que a utilização de conteúdos estáticos, como fotos por exemplo, quando relacionado a essa temática, podem facilitar o engajamento do usuário (BASCH et al, 2019;HABIBI;SALIM, 2021). Resultados semelhantes ao aqui apresentado foram observados em outro estudo que analisou postagens do Instagram na língua inglesa referentes ao câncer de mama, no qual a maioria das postagens era também composta por fotos (BASCH; MACLEAN, 2019), o que sugere que a escolha desse tipo de mídia para divulgar o tema do câncer de mama no Instagram não é exclusiva dos brasileiros.…”

Testing how different narrative perspectives achieve communication objectives and goals in online natural science videos

“…[ 17 – 19 ]), fan pages and mixed media on Facebook [ 19 , 20 ], images and short video on Instagram (e.g. [ 15 , 19 – 21 ]), and video on TikTok (e.g. [ 21 ]) and YouTube [ 19 , 22 ].…”

“…[ 15 , 19 – 21 ]), and video on TikTok (e.g. [ 21 ]) and YouTube [ 19 , 22 ]. Arguably, social media platforms that favor user-generated video, with users on-screen delivering their content, present the highest fidelity opportunities for public audiences to meet a scientist and for scientist-users to present highly individuated depictions of themselves and their work.…”

“…User-generated video has been a dominant form of content on popular online media platforms for decades, from the original Broadcast Yourself slogan of YouTube to selfie-style content of TikTok. Correspondingly, these video-focused platforms have increasingly become recognized and evaluated as popular media for effective science communication [ 21 , 24 – 26 ]. Many studies of this type of media assess characteristics of successful YouTube content by evaluating previously published videos from established and popular channels (e.g., [ 5 , 7 , 27 ]).…”