2013
DOI: 10.1109/mits.2013.2276939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stationary Detection of the Pedestrian?s Intention at Intersections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, there is a yawning gap between gait recognition and pedestrians' intention or action classification. In [13], early indicators of the pedestrian's intention to cross the street are divided into those presumably followed by crossing, e.g. turning the head or catching the vehicle driver's eye, and those definitely followed by entering the lane, e.g.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, there is a yawning gap between gait recognition and pedestrians' intention or action classification. In [13], early indicators of the pedestrian's intention to cross the street are divided into those presumably followed by crossing, e.g. turning the head or catching the vehicle driver's eye, and those definitely followed by entering the lane, e.g.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, trajectory forecasting of VRUs benefits from an early and reliable detection of starting motions, as shown in [3]. While pedestrian movement detection has been analyzed before, e.g., in [4] and [5], cyclists have gained less attention. The proposed system is dedicated to detect cyclist starting motions using infrastructure based sensors which can be part of future intelligent network traffic systems.…”
Section: A Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, only the current position, speed, heading, and acceleration of pedestrians in line-of-sight (in certain cases also in situations without line-of-sight) and within the detection range of on-board sensors can be used for the prediction. Advanced systems-for example, those introduced in Köhler et al (2013)-additionally use the potential of head and foot positions for the prediction. New information sources allow new prediction models to use additional information about pedestrians that is not directly measurable by on-board sensors of the vehicle.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the evaluation of head position (Kloeden et al 2014) and foot movement (Köhler et al 2013) shows high potential for this task.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%