2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stationary versus non-stationary 13C-MFA: A comparison using a consistent dataset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already shown in former experiments following the labeling of transients in a C. glutamicum L-lysine producer and E. coli wild type (25,26), isotopic stationarity is rapidly achieved (i.e., within a few minutes) for intermediates of the EMP and PPP. In contrast, the time constants for TCA cycle intermediates are much higher, leading to significantly delays in labeling dynamics; isotopic stationary states are not reached until 1 h of labeling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As already shown in former experiments following the labeling of transients in a C. glutamicum L-lysine producer and E. coli wild type (25,26), isotopic stationarity is rapidly achieved (i.e., within a few minutes) for intermediates of the EMP and PPP. In contrast, the time constants for TCA cycle intermediates are much higher, leading to significantly delays in labeling dynamics; isotopic stationary states are not reached until 1 h of labeling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The calculation of intracellular reaction rates presented here is based on the classical 13 C MFA approach that strictly relies on the assumption of isotopic stationarity (25). As already shown in former experiments following the labeling of transients in a C. glutamicum L-lysine producer and E. coli wild type (25,26), isotopic stationarity is rapidly achieved (i.e., within a few minutes) for intermediates of the EMP and PPP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardization is also a prerequisite for comparability and reproducibility of fluxomics studies, which is a neglected aspect ( [66,75] are rare exceptions). The fundamental question is: how accurate and precise is the flux measurement?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the additional measurements of labeling over time in a temporal analysis (Fig. 3) provide a richer set of data for modeling purposes [321] over steady state analysis alone. Additionally, because the earliest time points are the most sensitive to label provision, they provide a significant amount of information and the experimental duration can be shortened [322,323].…”
Section: From Co 2 To Lipid: Temporal Labeling-based Mfa Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%