2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34475-6_64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Analysis of Arabic Phonemes Used in Arabic Speech Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A correlation analysis was also performed to determine if the frequency of occurrence of French or Arabic consonants influenced the accuracy of consonants’ production for that language (see Appendix). This frequency analysis used data on the frequency of consonants in adults in French from Malécot (1974) and Arabic from Nahar et al (2012). Finally, the speech pattern analysis focused on differences children produced compared to adult targets to document whether they used language-specific sounds (e.g., Arabic) in the productions of their other language (e.g., French).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A correlation analysis was also performed to determine if the frequency of occurrence of French or Arabic consonants influenced the accuracy of consonants’ production for that language (see Appendix). This frequency analysis used data on the frequency of consonants in adults in French from Malécot (1974) and Arabic from Nahar et al (2012). Finally, the speech pattern analysis focused on differences children produced compared to adult targets to document whether they used language-specific sounds (e.g., Arabic) in the productions of their other language (e.g., French).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manner and place of articulation contribute significantly to complexity in all four languages, and not only in Arabic and French as predicted by H1.a. In other words, children in these languages do not systematically avoid fricatives or liquids, which are frequent in the ambient language (dos Santos 2007 for French, Nahar et al 2012 for Arabic), and to which they are consequently frequently exposed to via CDS. Similarly, for place of articulation, although children prefer labials and coronals to dorsals in the early period of production, they are able to produce posterior consonants (like dorsals and/or pharyngeals) when these types of sounds are frequently encountered in the ambient language (i.e., typically in Afro-Asiatic languages where they are rather frequent as shown by Basset (1946) and Bonnot (1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also focused on how to select optimum features from a 48-dimensional MDLF to increase the speaker recognition rate and the possibility of applying the MDLF features to Arabic speech recognition systems. In Arabic, some authors like the one in [21] suggested that knowing the length of a specific phoneme can assist in speeding up the recognition process as well as increasing recognition accuracy. As a result, the authors have presented a statistical study and analysis of the Arabic phonemes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%